CAREY v. CARGILL, INC., 3:15-cv-00922-WHO. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160201g59
Visitors: 20
Filed: Dec. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2015
Summary: PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND RELATED STIPULATION PER FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . STIPULATION TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD: Plaintiff RITA CAREY, by and through her attorneys of record, hereby requests this Court to dismiss this action with prejudice. Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Defendants CARGILL, INC. and CARGILL, INC. dba CARGILL SALT ("Defendants") by and through their attorneys of record, represent Defendants' non-
Summary: PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND RELATED STIPULATION PER FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . STIPULATION TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD: Plaintiff RITA CAREY, by and through her attorneys of record, hereby requests this Court to dismiss this action with prejudice. Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Defendants CARGILL, INC. and CARGILL, INC. dba CARGILL SALT ("Defendants") by and through their attorneys of record, represent Defendants' non-o..
More
PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND RELATED STIPULATION PER FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
STIPULATION
TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD:
Plaintiff RITA CAREY, by and through her attorneys of record, hereby requests this Court to dismiss this action with prejudice. Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Defendants CARGILL, INC. and CARGILL, INC. dba CARGILL SALT ("Defendants") by and through their attorneys of record, represent Defendants' non-objection to Plaintiff's request to dismiss her case with prejudice, and thus Defendants hereby stipulate to the same. The parties have entered into a settlement agreement that already addresses each party's obligations regarding the payment of fees and costs.
ORDER
The Court having read and considered the foregoing request and stipulation, and with good cause appearing, this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Court acknowledges that the parties have entered into a settlement agreement that addresses the payment of their respective fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED
Source: Leagle
