STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

BETH L. FREEMAN, District Judge.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(c), Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Horus Vision, LLC ("Horus Vision") and Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs Applied Ballistics, LLC, Applied Ballistics, Inc., and Applied Ballistics Media, Inc. ("Applied Ballistics") stipulate that Horus Vision's claims are dismissed with prejudice in their entirety and Applied Ballistics' first counterclaim seeking a declaration of invalidity is dismissed without prejudice and their second counterclaim seeking a declaration of non-infringement is dismissed with prejudice. Judge Freeman, or in her absence, the Northern District of California, will retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties' confidential settlement agreement (the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference). Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.

By his signature below, counsel for Horus Vision attests under penalty of perjury that counsel for Applied Ballistics concurs in the filing of this document.

FILER'S ATTESTION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1, the undersigned attests that all Parties have concurred in the filing of this Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice and [Proposed] Order.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF ALL PARTIES, AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN:

Horus Vision's claims are dismissed with prejudice in their entirety and Applied Ballistics' first counterclaim seeking a declaration of invalidity is dismissed without prejudice and their second counterclaim seeking a declaration of non-infringement is dismissed with prejudice. The undersigned, or in my absence, the Northern District of California, shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties' confidential settlement agreement (the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference). Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.