HUTCHINS v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, Case Number 5:15-cv-00640-BLF. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20151222870
Visitors: 16
Filed: Nov. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff JAMES A HUTCHINS and defendants PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC and MICHAEL HUNT dba HUNT & HENRIQUES, through their respective counsel, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the above-referenced case should be DISMISSED with prejudice. The parties further stipulate that they shall each bear their own Attorney's
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff JAMES A HUTCHINS and defendants PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC and MICHAEL HUNT dba HUNT & HENRIQUES, through their respective counsel, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the above-referenced case should be DISMISSED with prejudice. The parties further stipulate that they shall each bear their own Attorney's f..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
BETH LABSON FREEMAN, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff JAMES A HUTCHINS and defendants PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC and MICHAEL HUNT dba HUNT & HENRIQUES, through their respective counsel, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the above-referenced case should be DISMISSED with prejudice. The parties further stipulate that they shall each bear their own Attorney's fees, expenses, and costs associated with the aforementioned case.
SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
The parties having so stipulated and agreed, it is hereby SO ORDERED. The above-referenced case is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice and without an award of costs or fees to any party.
Source: Leagle
