Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Miranda v. Office of Commissioner of Baseball, 3:14-cv-05349-HSG. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150626a58 Visitors: 26
Filed: Jun. 25, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CHANGING TIME HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Civil Rules 6-1 and 6-2, the parties through undersigned counsel hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court extend the deadline for Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The parties declare in support of this request: WHEREAS, pursuant to a Stipulation Changing Time, filed on March 4, 2015, the parties stipulated to moving a scheduled case m
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CHANGING TIME

Pursuant to Local Civil Rules 6-1 and 6-2, the parties through undersigned counsel hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court extend the deadline for Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The parties declare in support of this request:

WHEREAS, pursuant to a Stipulation Changing Time, filed on March 4, 2015, the parties stipulated to moving a scheduled case management conference from March 10, 2015 to March 17, 2015, due to a scheduling conflict for Plaintiffs' counsel;

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Stipulation and Order re Briefing Schedule and Page Limits, issued on March 10, 2015, Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss is due on June 25, 2015, and the Defendants' reply to the Plaintiffs' opposition is due on July 16, 2015;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs request a five-day extension of time for filing the opposition to the motion to dismiss, due to a scheduling conflict for Plaintiffs' counsel;

WHEREAS, Defendants do not oppose the request;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs agree to extend the deadline of Defendants' reply to Plaintiffs' opposition by five days;

THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, the parties through their respective attorneys stipulate as follows:

1. Plaintiffs shall file their Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss on June 30, 2015; 2. Defendants shall file their Reply to the Opposition on July 21, 2015.

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED

CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE FROM OTHER PARTIES

I, David J. Rosen, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CHANGING TIME. In compliance with N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that each of the signatories has concurred in the filing of this document and has authorized the use of his or her electronic signature.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. With the exception of Baltimore Orioles Limited Partnership and Baltimore Orioles, Inc., Keker & Van Nest is counsel to all Defendants in this matter.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer