Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Kandi v. Langford, CV 17-3617 FMO(JC). (2018)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20181116777 Visitors: 1
Filed: Nov. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 14, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT FERNANDO M. OLGUIN , District Judge . In accordance with the concurrently issued Order (1) Dismissing Second Amended Complaint and Action; and (2) Denying Motion to Dismiss as Moot, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the operative Second Amended Complaint is dismissed without further leave to amend and that this action is dismissed with prejudice as to plaintiff's federal claims and without prejudice as to any state claims. IT IS SO ADJUDGED.

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the concurrently issued Order (1) Dismissing Second Amended Complaint and Action; and (2) Denying Motion to Dismiss as Moot, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the operative Second Amended Complaint is dismissed without further leave to amend and that this action is dismissed with prejudice as to plaintiff's federal claims and without prejudice as to any state claims.

IT IS SO ADJUDGED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer