Filed: Dec. 11, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DECEMBER 11, 2009 No. 09-13873 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-81164-CV-JIC JULIE ANN DOMOTOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JUDGE RICHARD I. WENNET, WILLIAM JACOB STEINBACH, III, CAREY HAUGHWOUT, JAMES H. MAHONEY, Defendants-Appellees, PALM BEACH COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, Defendant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Sou
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DECEMBER 11, 2009 No. 09-13873 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-81164-CV-JIC JULIE ANN DOMOTOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JUDGE RICHARD I. WENNET, WILLIAM JACOB STEINBACH, III, CAREY HAUGHWOUT, JAMES H. MAHONEY, Defendants-Appellees, PALM BEACH COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, Defendant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Sout..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
DECEMBER 11, 2009
No. 09-13873 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 08-81164-CV-JIC
JULIE ANN DOMOTOR,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
JUDGE RICHARD I. WENNET,
WILLIAM JACOB STEINBACH, III,
CAREY HAUGHWOUT,
JAMES H. MAHONEY,
Defendants-Appellees,
PALM BEACH COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,
Defendant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(December 11, 2009)
Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The district court dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to Heck v.
Humphrey,
512 U.S. 477,
114 S. Ct. 2364,
129 L. Ed. 2d 383 (1994), appellant’s
claims for false arrest and false imprisonment, and for conspiracy to commit those
offenses, because those claims, if successful, would have negated appellant’s
underlying criminal convictions. She now appeals the dismissal. We affirm. As
the district court properly explained in its June 30, 2009 order of dismissal, so long
as those convictions remain undisturbed, Heck V. Humphrey bars appellant’s
claims.
AFFIRMED.
2