Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Julie Ann Domotor v. Judge Richard I. Wennett, 09-13873 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 09-13873 Visitors: 17
Filed: Dec. 11, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DECEMBER 11, 2009 No. 09-13873 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-81164-CV-JIC JULIE ANN DOMOTOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JUDGE RICHARD I. WENNET, WILLIAM JACOB STEINBACH, III, CAREY HAUGHWOUT, JAMES H. MAHONEY, Defendants-Appellees, PALM BEACH COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, Defendant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Sou
More
                                                       [DO NOT PUBLISH]


           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                              FILED
                  FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                    ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                        DECEMBER 11, 2009
                           No. 09-13873                 THOMAS K. KAHN
                       Non-Argument Calendar                CLERK
                     ________________________

                  D. C. Docket No. 08-81164-CV-JIC

JULIE ANN DOMOTOR,


                                                         Plaintiff-Appellant,

                                versus

JUDGE RICHARD I. WENNET,
WILLIAM JACOB STEINBACH, III,
CAREY HAUGHWOUT,
JAMES H. MAHONEY,


                                                      Defendants-Appellees,

PALM BEACH COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,

                                                                 Defendant.


                     ________________________

              Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Southern District of Florida
                    _________________________
                         (December 11, 2009)
Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      The district court dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to Heck v.

Humphrey, 
512 U.S. 477
, 
114 S. Ct. 2364
, 
129 L. Ed. 2d 383
(1994), appellant’s

claims for false arrest and false imprisonment, and for conspiracy to commit those

offenses, because those claims, if successful, would have negated appellant’s

underlying criminal convictions. She now appeals the dismissal. We affirm. As

the district court properly explained in its June 30, 2009 order of dismissal, so long

as those convictions remain undisturbed, Heck V. Humphrey bars appellant’s

claims.

      AFFIRMED.




                                           2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer