NERO v. BAE SYSTEMS, INC., 13-04271 PJH. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150109568
Visitors: 25
Filed: Jan. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge. Having completed their respective obligations under a written settlement agreement, Plaintiff Martin Nero ("Plaintiff") and Defendants BAE SYSTEMS, INC.; BAE SYSTEMS SHIP REPAIR, INC.; BAE SYSTEMS SAN FRANCISCO SHIP REPAIR, INC.; HUGH VANDERSPEK; and JIM VAUGHT ("Defendants") (collectively "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The above-ca
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge. Having completed their respective obligations under a written settlement agreement, Plaintiff Martin Nero ("Plaintiff") and Defendants BAE SYSTEMS, INC.; BAE SYSTEMS SHIP REPAIR, INC.; BAE SYSTEMS SAN FRANCISCO SHIP REPAIR, INC.; HUGH VANDERSPEK; and JIM VAUGHT ("Defendants") (collectively "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The above-cap..
More
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
Having completed their respective obligations under a written settlement agreement, Plaintiff Martin Nero ("Plaintiff") and Defendants BAE SYSTEMS, INC.; BAE SYSTEMS SHIP REPAIR, INC.; BAE SYSTEMS SAN FRANCISCO SHIP REPAIR, INC.; HUGH VANDERSPEK; and JIM VAUGHT ("Defendants") (collectively "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. The above-captioned action shall be dismissed with prejudice; and
2. Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs of suit.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
