DAVIS v. SANTA RITA JAIL, C14-1468 EMC. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150611826
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 22, 2015
Latest Update: May 22, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Plaintiff MICHAEL C. DAVIS and Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO by and through their respective counsels, jointly stipulate as follows: On May 6, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Third Amended Complaint against Defendants. The parties have agreed to a ten day extension for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint. IT
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Plaintiff MICHAEL C. DAVIS and Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO by and through their respective counsels, jointly stipulate as follows: On May 6, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Third Amended Complaint against Defendants. The parties have agreed to a ten day extension for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint. IT I..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff MICHAEL C. DAVIS and Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO by and through their respective counsels, jointly stipulate as follows:
On May 6, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Third Amended Complaint against Defendants. The parties have agreed to a ten day extension for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff and Defendant, through their undersigned counsels of record: Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO'S Answer to Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint is now due on June 1, 2015.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Source: Leagle
