Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

IN THE MATTER OF WEBSTER, CV 14-02899-RGK (MANx). (2014)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20140430b02 Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2014
Summary: [PROPOSED] NOTICE TO RESPONDENT AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge. Based on the Petition, Memorandum of Points and Authorities, and Declaration, the Court finds that Petitioner has established its prima facie case for judicial approval of an IRS levy on the principal residence of Raymond Webster (Respondent) located at Identifier "A" [redacted from public case file pursuant to Local Rule 79-5.4] (the property), in order to sell the property and apply the proceeds to Res
More

[PROPOSED] NOTICE TO RESPONDENT AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge.

Based on the Petition, Memorandum of Points and Authorities, and Declaration, the Court finds that Petitioner has established its prima facie case for judicial approval of an IRS levy on the principal residence of Raymond Webster (Respondent) located at Identifier "A" [redacted from public case file pursuant to Local Rule 79-5.4] (the property), in order to sell the property and apply the proceeds to Respondent's outstanding income tax liability for tax years 2005 through 2010, inclusive.

IT IS ORDERED that copies of the following documents be served on Respondent by personal delivery or certified mail:

1. This Order; and

2. The Petition, Memorandum of Points and Authorities, and Declaration. Service may be made by any employee of the IRS or the United States Attorney's Office.

IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that Respondent has 21 days to from the date this order is served to file a written Objection to the Petition with the Clerk of the District Court and mail a copy of the Objection to Petitioner.

IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that Respondent's Objection may raise the following defenses: (1) the underlying tax liability has been satisfied; (2) Respondent has other assets from which the liability can be satisfied; and (3) the IRS did not follow the applicable laws or procedures pertaining to the levy. However, Respondent is not permitted to challenge the merits underlying the tax liability.

IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that Respondent appear before this District Court of the United States for the Central District of California, at the following date, time and address, and show cause why the Court should not enter an order approving the IRS administrative levy on the property:

Date: June 16, 2014 Time: 9:00 am Courtroom: 850 Address: Roybal Federal Building and United States Courthouse 255 E. Temple Street, Los Angeles, California, 90012

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all motions and issues raised by the pleadings will be considered on the return date of this Order. Only those issues timely raised by motion or brought into controversy by the responsive pleadings and supported by sworn statements filed within 21 days after service of this Order will be considered by the Court. All allegations in the Petition not contested by such responsive pleadings or by sworn statements will be deemed admitted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Respondent fails to file an Objection to the Petition within 21 days of service of this order, or if Respondent fails to appear before the Court as instructed, the Court may enter an Order approving the IRS levy on the property.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if, prior to the return date of this Order, Respondent files a response with the Court stating that Respondent does not oppose the relief sought in the Petition, nor wish to make an appearance, then the appearance of Respondent at any hearing pursuant to this Order to Show Cause is excused, and the IRS may levy the property.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer