American Civil Liberties Union of San Diego and Imperial Counties v. United States Department of Homeland Security, 8:15-cv-00229-JLS-RNB. (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180514635
Visitors: 8
Filed: May 11, 2018
Latest Update: May 11, 2018
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT JOSEPHINE L. STATON , District Judge . In orders dated November 6, 2017, and April 19, 2018, the Court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and also granted in part and denied in part Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. (Docs. 90, 94.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Court hereby ENTERS judgment in favor of Defendants with respect to the following: (1) the adequacy of Defendants' search; (2) the withholding of C
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT JOSEPHINE L. STATON , District Judge . In orders dated November 6, 2017, and April 19, 2018, the Court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and also granted in part and denied in part Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. (Docs. 90, 94.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Court hereby ENTERS judgment in favor of Defendants with respect to the following: (1) the adequacy of Defendants' search; (2) the withholding of Ch..
More
FINAL JUDGMENT
JOSEPHINE L. STATON, District Judge.
In orders dated November 6, 2017, and April 19, 2018, the Court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and also granted in part and denied in part Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. (Docs. 90, 94.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Court hereby ENTERS judgment in favor of Defendants with respect to the following:
(1) the adequacy of Defendants' search;
(2) the withholding of Chapters 16 and 17 of the Enforcement Law Course ("ELC") as attorney work-product under Exemption 5;
(3) the withholding of Sections 3.1010, 5.540, 6.210 (including all subsections), 6.630d, 6.420a, 6.530, 7.264, 7.610, 7.612, 7.1500, 8.866, 8.900, 12.126 (including all subsections), 14.950, 18.347, 18.351b, 18.351c, 18.348, and 20.300, and Chapter 12 of the ELC under Exemption 7(E);
(4) all withholdings of CBP personnel names contained in the ELC under Exemptions 6 and 7(C);
(5) the withholding of five "policy memos" under Exemption 7(E);
(6) the withholding of pages 70-83 of Border Patrol Academy Records Vaughn1 No. 8 under Exemption 5;
(7) the withholding of information under Exemption 7(E), as listed in Border Patrol Academy Records Vaughn Nos. 1-7, 12, 22-23, and 36-38;
(8) information under Exemption 7(E), as listed in BPA Vaughn Nos. 49, 55, and 56, with the exception of the information redacted on pages 6 and 7 of each of those records; and
(9) photos and personal identifying information under Exemption 7(C), as listed in BPA Vaughn Nos. 1-5, 9, 10, 46-49, and 55-56.
The Court ENTERS judgment in favor of Plaintiffs on the remainder of the Enforcement Law Course and the remainder of the BPA records.
FootNotes
1. See Notice of Lodging, ECF No. 93.
Source: Leagle
