Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HIGHTOWER v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, C 12-5841-EMC (NJV). (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150112526 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Oxane "Gypsy" Taub and George Davis, and Defendants the City and County of San Francisco and the San Francisco Police Department, through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. On December 24, 2014, the Court filed its order granting in part, and
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs Oxane "Gypsy" Taub and George Davis, and Defendants the City and County of San Francisco and the San Francisco Police Department, through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. On December 24, 2014, the Court filed its order granting in part, and denying, in part, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint [Dkt No. 104].

2. Defendants' last day to respond to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint ("Complaint"), following the Court's December 24, 2014 order, is currently January 7, 2015.

3. On or about January 6, 2015, Defendants' lead counsel, Tara Steeley, suffered an unexpected death in her family, requiring her to be out of the office and out of state to attend to family.

4. In light of the foregoing, Defendants have requested, and Plaintiffs have agreed, that subject to the approval of the Court, Defendants may have a 14-day extension of time to respond to the Complaint, making Defendants' response to the Complaint due on or before January 21, 2015.

5. The requested extension of time to respond to the Complaint does not affect any hearing or proceeding on the Court's calendar.

SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, Defendants City and County of San Francisco and the San Francisco Police Department shall file their response to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint on or before January 21, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer