Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

KIHAGI v. CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 15-cv-01168 KAW. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150817575 Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 14, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DUE DATE FOR OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR ABSTENTION UNTIL AUGUST 17, 20015 AND TO EXTEND DATE FOR CITY'S REPLY UNTIL AUGUST 24, 2015 KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . THE PARTIES BY AND THROUGH THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: Plaintiffs and the defendants hereby agree and stipulate subject to Court's approval that the due date plaintiffs' opposition to the defendants' Motion for Abstention Pending Resolution of State Court Proceeding shall be
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DUE DATE FOR OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR ABSTENTION UNTIL AUGUST 17, 20015 AND TO EXTEND DATE FOR CITY'S REPLY UNTIL AUGUST 24, 2015

THE PARTIES BY AND THROUGH THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

Plaintiffs and the defendants hereby agree and stipulate subject to Court's approval that the due date plaintiffs' opposition to the defendants' Motion for Abstention Pending Resolution of State Court Proceeding shall be extended from August 13, 2015 until August 17, 2015 and further that the due date for defendants' reply to the opposition to the Motion shall be extended from August 20, 2015 until August 24, 2015.

SO STIPULATED.

ORDER ON STIPULATION

Based on the foregoing Stipulation by and between Plaintiffs and Defendant, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The due date for Plaintiffs' opposition to the Defendants' motion for abstention is extended from August 13, 2015 until August 17, 2015. The due date for the defendants' reply to the opposition is extended from August 20, 2015 until August 24, 2015. The hearing date remains as previously scheduled.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer