GOLD v. LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., 3:14-cv-05373-TEH. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150813788
Visitors: 1
Filed: Aug. 12, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 12, 2015
Summary: CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE BRIEFS RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT THELTON E. HENDERSON , District Judge . The parties hereby STIPULATE as follows: 1. Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendant's motions to dismiss and to strike portions of Plaintiffs' complaint shall be due on September 11, 2015. 2. Defendant's reply briefs shall be due on September 25, 2015. 3. The hearing on these motions,
Summary: CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE BRIEFS RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT THELTON E. HENDERSON , District Judge . The parties hereby STIPULATE as follows: 1. Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendant's motions to dismiss and to strike portions of Plaintiffs' complaint shall be due on September 11, 2015. 2. Defendant's reply briefs shall be due on September 25, 2015. 3. The hearing on these motions, ..
More
CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE BRIEFS RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge.
The parties hereby STIPULATE as follows:
1. Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendant's motions to dismiss and to strike portions of Plaintiffs' complaint shall be due on September 11, 2015.
2. Defendant's reply briefs shall be due on September 25, 2015.
3. The hearing on these motions, currently set for September 14, 2015, shall be reset to a date convenient to the Court.
In addition, the parties recognize that this stipulation is filed four days prior to the first existing deadline, which does not comply with Paragraph 3 this Court's Standing Order requiring such motions five days prior. The parties apologize for any inconvenience to the Court. The parties respectfully request that the Court enter this order despite it being submitted late, on the basis that: 1) the stipulation is only one day late and is not being filed on the due date of the opposition brief; 2) the tardiness arises from the fact that the stipulation was finalized only this last weekend; and 3) the stipulation obviates the need for any party to file a motion for administrative relief under Paragraph 3 of this Court's Standing Order.
ORDER
Good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS as follows:
1. Plaintiffs' opposition briefs shall be due on September 11, 2015.
2. Defendant's reply briefs shall be due on September 25, 2015.
3. The motions shall be heard on October 19, 2015 at 10:00 AM. SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
