Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

PINTEREST, INC. v. PINTRIPS, INC., C 13-4608-HSG. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150223692 Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 20, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PRETRIAL SCHEDULE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Pinterest, Inc. ("Pinterest") and Defendant Pintrips, Inc. ("Pintrips") respectfully submit this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Pretrial Schedule. WHEREAS, this case was previously assigned to Judge Richard Seeborg, whose scheduling order set a final pretrial conference on March 12, 2015 and start o
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PRETRIAL SCHEDULE

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Pinterest, Inc. ("Pinterest") and Defendant Pintrips, Inc. ("Pintrips") respectfully submit this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Pretrial Schedule.

WHEREAS, this case was previously assigned to Judge Richard Seeborg, whose scheduling order set a final pretrial conference on March 12, 2015 and start of trial on March 23, 2015. See Dkt. #42 ¶¶ 6-7.

WHEREAS, on February 13, 2015 this case was reassigned to Judge Haywood Gilliam, whose reassignment order provides that "[a]ll pretrial conference and trial dates scheduled on or before June 19, 2015 are vacated" and "[a]ll discovery cutoff and other pretrial deadlines (e.g., motions in limine, pretrial statements, proposed joint trial exhibits, etc.) will remain in place." See Order Reassigning Case ¶ 8.

WHEREAS, the existing non-discovery pretrial deadlines (e.g., motions in limine, pretrial statements, proposed joint trial exhibits, etc.) are triggered by the now-vacated final pretrial conference and trial dates. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3); Judge Seeborg's Trial Standing Orders.

WHEREAS, Pinterest and Pintrips believe that vacating such non-discovery pretrial deadlines pending the determination of new dates for a pretrial conference and start of trial will serve the interests of efficiency and economy in this case.

WHEREAS, the two previous scheduling modifications in this case did not affect any non-discovery pretrial deadlines. See Dkt. ## 99, 131.

NOW, THEREFORE, Pinterest and Pintrips stipulate that all deadlines triggered by the final pretrial conference and start of trial (e.g., motions in limine, pretrial statements, proposed joint trial exhibits, etc.) shall be vacated pending determination of new dates for a final pretrial conference and start of trial.

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the parties' agreement and adopts the stipulation. All deadlines triggered by the final pretrial conference and start of trial (e.g., motions in limine, pretrial statements, proposed joint trial exhibits, etc.) shall be vacated pending determination of new dates for a final pretrial conference and start of trial. A case management conference is set for March 10, 2015, at 2:00 pm. The parties are directed to file a joint case management statement no later than March 2, 2015.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer