Filed: Nov. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2015
Summary: ORDER PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . On November 19, 2015, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, noticed for hearing on January 20, 2016. The court previously approved a stipulated briefing schedule that set the date for the filing of the opposition and reply on December 23, 2015, and January 14, 2015, respectively. While the approved stipulation also provided for a hearing date "no earlier than January 20, 2016," six days is an insufficient amount of time for the cour
Summary: ORDER PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . On November 19, 2015, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, noticed for hearing on January 20, 2016. The court previously approved a stipulated briefing schedule that set the date for the filing of the opposition and reply on December 23, 2015, and January 14, 2015, respectively. While the approved stipulation also provided for a hearing date "no earlier than January 20, 2016," six days is an insufficient amount of time for the court..
More
ORDER
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
On November 19, 2015, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, noticed for hearing on January 20, 2016. The court previously approved a stipulated briefing schedule that set the date for the filing of the opposition and reply on December 23, 2015, and January 14, 2015, respectively. While the approved stipulation also provided for a hearing date "no earlier than January 20, 2016," six days is an insufficient amount of time for the court to review the parties' papers and prepare for the hearing. The Civil Local Rules of this court provide for a minimum of 14 days between the filing of the reply brief and the hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-2. Accordingly, defendants shall renotice the hearing for a date no earlier than February 3, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
