U.S. v. UNIVOZ, INC., CV 12-4437 FMO (RZx). (2013)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20130521750
Visitors: 8
Filed: May 20, 2013
Latest Update: May 20, 2013
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION RE: SETTLEMENT OF CASE, VACATE DATES SET BY COURT, AND TO PLACE CASE ON INACTIVE STATUS FERNANDO M. OLGUIN, District Judge. Pursuant to the "STIPULATION RE: SETTLEMENT OF CASE, VACATE DATES SET BY COURT, AND TO PLACE CASE ON INACTIVE STATUS" filed by the parties, and for good cause appearing therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The parties have reached a settlement in this matter which has been accepted by the Department of Justice, Tax Division. 2. Defendants will be
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION RE: SETTLEMENT OF CASE, VACATE DATES SET BY COURT, AND TO PLACE CASE ON INACTIVE STATUS FERNANDO M. OLGUIN, District Judge. Pursuant to the "STIPULATION RE: SETTLEMENT OF CASE, VACATE DATES SET BY COURT, AND TO PLACE CASE ON INACTIVE STATUS" filed by the parties, and for good cause appearing therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The parties have reached a settlement in this matter which has been accepted by the Department of Justice, Tax Division. 2. Defendants will be ..
More
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION RE: SETTLEMENT OF CASE, VACATE DATES SET BY COURT, AND TO PLACE CASE ON INACTIVE STATUS
FERNANDO M. OLGUIN, District Judge.
Pursuant to the "STIPULATION RE: SETTLEMENT OF CASE, VACATE DATES SET BY COURT, AND TO PLACE CASE ON INACTIVE STATUS" filed by the parties, and for good cause appearing therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The parties have reached a settlement in this matter which has been accepted by the Department of Justice, Tax Division.
2. Defendants will be making monthly payments to plaintiff over a six-month period, with payment due on the 15th day of each month, but no later than the 20th of each month. The first payment by defendants will be due to plaintiff on June 15, 2013 and the last payment will be due on November 15, 2013 (excluding the 5-day grace period as enumerated in the preceding sentence).
3. Concurrently, the parties have executed a "Stipulation to Dismiss Case Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)" and "Stipulation for Entry of Judgment."
4. In the event that the terms of the settlement are fully complied with by defendants by November 15, 2013 (or by November 20, 2013, including the 5-day grace period enumerated in paragraph 2, above), the parties will thereafter file the "Stipulation to Dismiss Case Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)," which will resolve the entire case before the Court.
5. In the event that the terms of the settlement are not fully complied with and defendants breach the settlement agreement, the United States of America will file the "Stipulation for Entry of Judgment" which will resolve the entire case before the Court, along with a proposed Order for the Court to enter the Judgment agreed to by the parties in the "Stipulation for Entry of Judgment."
6. The Court's scheduling order filed on December 10, 2012 is hereby vacated and this case is placed on inactive status with the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
