FURTHER STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LTD. TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 5 and 6-1(a), it is HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff THE WAVE STUDIO, LLC ("Plaintiff") and Defendant CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LTD. ("Defendant"), that Defendant shall have up to and including July 31, 2015 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, including but not limited to a challenge as to service, jurisdiction and/or venue.

WHEREAS, this is the second extension of Defendant's deadline to respond to the Complaint. The parties previously stipulated to an extension for Defendant to respond to the Complaint from June 11, 2015 to July 13, 2015. [Dkt. No. 18].

WHEREAS, the parties believe that a further extension of time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint up to and including July 31, 2015, will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by the Court.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by no later than July 31, 2015.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE

I, Robert A. Weikert, attest that I am one of the attorneys for Defendant Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd., and as the ECF user and filer of this document, I attest that pursuant to United States District Court, Northern District of California, Civil L.R. 5-l(i)(3), concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Vijay K. Toke, the above signatory.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.