United Aeronautical Corporation v. HB Corporation, 2:16-cv-04017-TJH-RAOx. (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180406978
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL [JS-6] ORDER TERRY J. HATTER, JR. , District Judge . The Court having considered the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefore, orders as follows: 1. The above-captioned complaint and counter-complaint is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. 2. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement between the Parti
Summary: ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL [JS-6] ORDER TERRY J. HATTER, JR. , District Judge . The Court having considered the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefore, orders as follows: 1. The above-captioned complaint and counter-complaint is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. 2. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement between the Partie..
More
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL [JS-6]
ORDER
TERRY J. HATTER, JR., District Judge.
The Court having considered the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefore, orders as follows:
1. The above-captioned complaint and counter-complaint is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.
2. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement between the Parties.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
