Filed: Dec. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 21, 2015
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO COMPLETE MEDIATION WILLIAM H. ALSUP , District Judge . PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-5, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, THROUGH THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 1. On September 28, 2015, following a Case Management Conference held on Sep-tember 24, 2015, the Court issued a Case Management Order referring this matter to mediation. (Docket Nos. 18 and 19). 2. Based on the date of the minute order following the case management conference (Docket
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO COMPLETE MEDIATION WILLIAM H. ALSUP , District Judge . PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-5, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, THROUGH THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 1. On September 28, 2015, following a Case Management Conference held on Sep-tember 24, 2015, the Court issued a Case Management Order referring this matter to mediation. (Docket Nos. 18 and 19). 2. Based on the date of the minute order following the case management conference (Docket N..
More
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO COMPLETE MEDIATION
WILLIAM H. ALSUP, District Judge.
PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-5, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, THROUGH THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
1. On September 28, 2015, following a Case Management Conference held on Sep-tember 24, 2015, the Court issued a Case Management Order referring this matter to mediation. (Docket Nos. 18 and 19).
2. Based on the date of the minute order following the case management conference (Docket No. 18), the current deadline for the mediation to be conducted is accordingly December 23, 2015.
3. Kristin W. Maloney, Esq. was subsequently appointed as the mediator. (Docket No. 20). The parties held a telephone conference with Ms. Maloney on or about November 2, 2015, at which time a mediation session was tentatively scheduled for December 8, 2015.
4. On November 15, 2015, the Defendants and Counterclaimants served their Amended Answer and Counterclaims on the U.S. Attorney's Office in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1).
5. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(2) allows the Plaintiff 60 days from the date of service on the U.S. Attorney's office to respond to Defendant's and Counterclaimants Amended Counter-claims, making Plaintiff's response to Defendant's and Counterclaimants Amended Counter-claim due January 14, 2016.
6. The parties believe that the mediation would be of more benefit after Plaintiff re-sponds to Defendants' and Counterclaimants Amended Counterclaims.
7. The Mediator, Ms. Maloney, is available to schedule the mediation session in the approximate February 2016 timeframe.
8. The parties request that the time to complete the mediation be extended to Febru-ary 26, 2016. This request will not affect any of the other currently scheduled deadlines or dates.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO COMPLETE MEDIATION
The Court having reviewed the Parties' Stipulated Request for Extension of Time in Which to Complete Mediation and good cause appearing therefor,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Parties shall have until February 26, 2016 to complete the mediation in this matter.
