Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

YTURRALDE v. AZTEC FORECLOSURE CORPORATION, 15-CV-00210-LHK. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150717943 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT CASE BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE LUCY H. KOH , District Judge . The Court has reviewed U.S. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins's Report and Recommendation (the "Report") to dismiss Plaintiffs' case for failure to prosecute. See ECF No. 52. The Report was filed on June 19, 2015, and mailed to Plaintiffs that same day. ECF No. 52-1. The time for objections has passed, and Plaintiffs have not filed any. See 28 U.
More

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT CASE BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

The Court has reviewed U.S. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins's Report and Recommendation (the "Report") to dismiss Plaintiffs' case for failure to prosecute. See ECF No. 52. The Report was filed on June 19, 2015, and mailed to Plaintiffs that same day. ECF No. 52-1. The time for objections has passed, and Plaintiffs have not filed any. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

Having reviewed the Report, as well as the record in this case, the Court finds that the Report is well-founded in fact and in law, and therefore adopts the Report with one exception: the Court notes that on June 25, 2015-24 days after the statutory deadline, 17 days after the extended deadline allowed by Judge Cousins, and 6 days after the Report was issued—Plaintiffs filed an opposition to Defendant Sabadell's motion to dismiss, with no explanation or excuse for the opposition's untimeliness. ECF No. 55. To date, Plaintiffs still have not opposed the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"), although that opposition was due on June 18, 2015.

Based on Plaintiffs' failure to timely oppose Sabadell's motion to dismiss, their failure to oppose the FDIC's motion to dismiss, their failure to file objections to the Report, and their consistent refusal to follow the Local Rules and the many orders issued by Judge Cousins as set forth in the Report, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report to dismiss Plaintiffs' case for failure to prosecute. Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the motion hearings and initial case management conference set for September 24, 2015, at 1:30 p.m.

The Clerk shall close the case file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer