U.S., SAN BENITO SUPPLY v. KISAQ-RQ 8A 2 JV, C13-00469 HRL. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150515b72
Visitors: 16
Filed: May 14, 2015
Latest Update: May 14, 2015
Summary: ORDER: (1) GRANTING SAN BENITO SUPPLY'S REQUEST FOR ADVERSARY SUBMISSIONS ON FRAZIER MASONRY'S MOTION FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES; and (2) SETTING DEADLINE FOR FRAZIER MASONRY TO FILE ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES [Re: Docket No. 135] HOWARD R. LLOYD , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is San Benito Supply's request for adversary submissions on Frazier Masonry's Motion for the Award of Attor
Summary: ORDER: (1) GRANTING SAN BENITO SUPPLY'S REQUEST FOR ADVERSARY SUBMISSIONS ON FRAZIER MASONRY'S MOTION FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES; and (2) SETTING DEADLINE FOR FRAZIER MASONRY TO FILE ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES [Re: Docket No. 135] HOWARD R. LLOYD , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is San Benito Supply's request for adversary submissions on Frazier Masonry's Motion for the Award of Attorn..
More
ORDER:
(1) GRANTING SAN BENITO SUPPLY'S REQUEST FOR ADVERSARY SUBMISSIONS ON FRAZIER MASONRY'S MOTION FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES; and
(2) SETTING DEADLINE FOR FRAZIER MASONRY TO FILE ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES [Re: Docket No. 135]
HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is San Benito Supply's request for adversary submissions on Frazier Masonry's Motion for the Award of Attorney Fees and Expert Witness Fees. Dkt. No. 135. For good cause shown, San Benito Supply's request for adversary submissions is granted. San Benito Supply may file an adversary submission by June 2, 2015. Frazier Masonry may file a reply by June 16, 2015. The hearing set for June 16, 2015 is vacated. The court may set a hearing, if needed, after the briefing is complete.
In addition, because its showing is presently incomplete, no later than May 22, 2015, Frazier Masonry will file declaration(s) that provide the evidence required by Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 895 n.11 (1984). Frazier Masonry shall also immediately submit a courtesy copy of its Motion for the Award of Attorney Fees and Expert Witness Fees with Exhibits, Dkt. No. 134, to Chambers. See Civ. L.R. 5-1(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle