CRUZ v. DURBIN, 2:11-cv-0342-LDG-VCF (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20140903f48
Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 02, 2014
Summary: ORDER LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge. It has come to the court's attention that the motion to intervene (#37), the motion to dismiss (#40), and the motion to compel and for discovery sanctions (#44) in Case No. 2:12-cv-1627-LDG-VCF have not been filed in Case No. 11-cv-0342-LDG-VCF (base file) in accordance with the consolidation order (#24). Therefore, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that within twenty days of the filing of this order the above-identified motions and related briefs of the parties s
Summary: ORDER LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge. It has come to the court's attention that the motion to intervene (#37), the motion to dismiss (#40), and the motion to compel and for discovery sanctions (#44) in Case No. 2:12-cv-1627-LDG-VCF have not been filed in Case No. 11-cv-0342-LDG-VCF (base file) in accordance with the consolidation order (#24). Therefore, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that within twenty days of the filing of this order the above-identified motions and related briefs of the parties sh..
More
ORDER
LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge.
It has come to the court's attention that the motion to intervene (#37), the motion to dismiss (#40), and the motion to compel and for discovery sanctions (#44) in Case No. 2:12-cv-1627-LDG-VCF have not been filed in Case No. 11-cv-0342-LDG-VCF (base file) in accordance with the consolidation order (#24). Therefore,
THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that within twenty days of the filing of this order the above-identified motions and related briefs of the parties shall be re-filed in the base file. If any other party wishes to respond to said filings, they should so move the court.
Source: Leagle
