PAPPEY v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 15-cv-00064-JST. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150327c42
Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 25, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 25, 2015
Summary: ORDER Re: ECF No. 25 JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the case management conference currently scheduled for April 15, 2015, is hereby rescheduled to June 24, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. A case management statement shall be due June 10, 2015. The parties' deadlines to act under Rule 26, including the conference of the parties pursuant to Rule 26(f) and initial disclosures under Rule 26(a), are hereby extended and discovery stayed. The parties shall conduct the Ru
Summary: ORDER Re: ECF No. 25 JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the case management conference currently scheduled for April 15, 2015, is hereby rescheduled to June 24, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. A case management statement shall be due June 10, 2015. The parties' deadlines to act under Rule 26, including the conference of the parties pursuant to Rule 26(f) and initial disclosures under Rule 26(a), are hereby extended and discovery stayed. The parties shall conduct the Rul..
More
ORDER Re: ECF No. 25
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the case management conference currently scheduled for April 15, 2015, is hereby rescheduled to June 24, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. A case management statement shall be due June 10, 2015. The parties' deadlines to act under Rule 26, including the conference of the parties pursuant to Rule 26(f) and initial disclosures under Rule 26(a), are hereby extended and discovery stayed. The parties shall conduct the Rule 26(f) conference at least 21 days before the rescheduled case management conference.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
