Sprint Communications Co., LP v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, 4:15-mc-80005-KAW. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150218945
Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 17, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR CISCO'S REPLY TO SPRINT'S RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER Actions pending in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas (2:11-cv-02684, 2:11-cv-2685, 2:11-cv-2586) KANDIS A. WESTMORE, District Judge. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12, Applicant Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Cisco") and Plaintiff Sprint Communications Co., Inc. ("Cisco"), by and through their counsel of record, stipulate that the deadline for Cisco's Repl
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR CISCO'S REPLY TO SPRINT'S RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER Actions pending in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas (2:11-cv-02684, 2:11-cv-2685, 2:11-cv-2586) KANDIS A. WESTMORE, District Judge. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12, Applicant Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Cisco") and Plaintiff Sprint Communications Co., Inc. ("Cisco"), by and through their counsel of record, stipulate that the deadline for Cisco's Reply..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR CISCO'S REPLY TO SPRINT'S RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
Actions pending in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas (2:11-cv-02684, 2:11-cv-2685, 2:11-cv-2586)
KANDIS A. WESTMORE, District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12, Applicant Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Cisco") and Plaintiff Sprint Communications Co., Inc. ("Cisco"), by and through their counsel of record, stipulate that the deadline for Cisco's Reply to Sprint's Response to Cisco's Motion for Protective Order be moved from February 17, 2015 to March 3, 2015 for the reasons set forth in the attached declaration.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Pursuant to General Order No. 45.X.B., the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the above Signatory.
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED THAT the deadline for Cisco's Reply to Sprint's Response to Cisco's Motion for Protective Order is set for March 3, 2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
