Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

FELIX v. ANDERSON, 3:14-cv-03809-HSG. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20151230758 Visitors: 17
Filed: Dec. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 29, 2015
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2; [PROPOSED] ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Plaintiffs Scott Felix and Patricia Shuey ("Plaintiffs") together with defendant Karin L. Anderson ("Defendant"), by and through their respective attorneys, do hereby agree and stipulate as follows: WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit on August 21, 2014; WHEREAS on February 9, 2015, this Court entered an order granting leave to serve summons upon
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Plaintiffs Scott Felix and Patricia Shuey ("Plaintiffs") together with defendant Karin L. Anderson ("Defendant"), by and through their respective attorneys, do hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit on August 21, 2014;

WHEREAS on February 9, 2015, this Court entered an order granting leave to serve summons upon Defendant by publication, finding that Plaintiffs "made exhaustive efforts to serve Defendant by other means" and that "the evidence suggests that Defendant is aware of the pending litigation against her and is evading service;"

WHEREAS on June 30, 2015, Defendant appeared in this case and filed her Answer to the complaint;

WHEREAS on July 24, 2015, Defendant filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, which motion was granted with leave to amend by this Court's order entered August 20, 2015;

WHEREAS on September 10, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint in this action;

WHEREAS on September 28, 2015, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, which motion was heard and denied on November 5, 2015;

WHEREAS on November 5, 2015, this Court issued a scheduling order which set the deadline for fact discovery as March 1, 2016, and the deadline for expert discovery as April 1, 2016;

WHEREAS following the hearing on the motion to dismiss, Plaintiffs began and are in the process of substituting attorneys in this action, which process has contributed to the delay in initial disclosures in this action;

WHEREAS in the rule 26(f) conference on December 14, 2015, Plaintiffs and Defendant agreed that given the short time frame, and the fact that no discovery had then been propounded, it was impracticable and unlikely that discovery would be completed by the February 1, 2016 and March 1, 2016 deadlines established by this Court's November 9, 2015 scheduling order;

WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Defendant wish to preserve the July 25, 2016 trial date in this matter while also allowing for additional time for the completion of discovery;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED:

1. The deadline for the close of fact discovery shall be extended from February 1, 2016, to April 1, 2016; 2. The deadline for the close of expert discovery shall be extended from March 1, 2016, to May 1, 2016; 3. All other deadlines in this Court's November 9, 2015 Scheduling Order shall remain unchanged.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer