ELLIS v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, C04-3341 EMC. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150729a74
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jul. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 28, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF ELAINE SASAKI'S CLAIMS EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . The parties stipulate to the dismissal, with prejudice, of Plaintiff Elaine Sasaki's claims, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This stipulation does not affect the class action settlement, over which the Court retains jurisdiction. IT IS SO STIPULATED. [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF ELAINE SASAKI'S CLAIMS EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . The parties stipulate to the dismissal, with prejudice, of Plaintiff Elaine Sasaki's claims, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This stipulation does not affect the class action settlement, over which the Court retains jurisdiction. IT IS SO STIPULATED. [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE ..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF ELAINE SASAKI'S CLAIMS
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
The parties stipulate to the dismissal, with prejudice, of Plaintiff Elaine Sasaki's claims, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This stipulation does not affect the class action settlement, over which the Court retains jurisdiction.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING,
Plaintiff Elaine Sasaki's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. This stipulation does not affect the class action settlement, over which the Court retains jurisdiction.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
