Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Clay v. San Bernardino County, ED CV 15-02395-AG (DFM). (2019)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20191218b71 Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANDREW J. GUILFORD , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the records and files herein, along with the two Reports and Recommendations (Dkt. 105 and 110) of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Reports and Recommendations were filed, and the deadline for filing such objections has passed. The Court accepts the findings, conclusions,
More

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the records and files herein, along with the two Reports and Recommendations (Dkt. 105 and 110) of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Reports and Recommendations were filed, and the deadline for filing such objections has passed. The Court accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Reports and Recommendations are approved and accepted.

2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.

3. Judgment shall be entered dismissing this case with prejudice as to Defendants Foxwell and Harris and without prejudice as to Defendant Lang.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer