Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hatamian v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 4:14-cv-00226-YGR. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150630d13 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 29, 2015
Summary: [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . On June 17, 2015, Lead Plaintiffs KBC Asset Management NV and Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, together with Defendants Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.; Rory P. Read; Thomas J. Seifert; Richard A. Bergman; and Dr. Lisa T. Su (collectively, the "Parties"), appeared before the Court for a Case Management Conference. Having considered the Parties' Amended Joint Case Management Conference Statement (Dkt #123) and stat
More

[PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

On June 17, 2015, Lead Plaintiffs KBC Asset Management NV and Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, together with Defendants Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.; Rory P. Read; Thomas J. Seifert; Richard A. Bergman; and Dr. Lisa T. Su (collectively, the "Parties"), appeared before the Court for a Case Management Conference. Having considered the Parties' Amended Joint Case Management Conference Statement (Dkt #123) and statements of counsel at the Case Management Conference, the Court orders as follows:

1. CLASS CERTIFICATION

Lead Plaintiffs will move for class certification in accordance with the schedule set forth below. Failure to make class representatives available pursuant to this Order may result in monetary and/or evidentiary sanctions.

Event Date Class Certification Motion Deadline September 7, 2015 Deposition of Class Representative(s) Between September 14 and 25, 2015 Response to Class Certification Motion October 22, 2015 Class Certification Motion Reply December 7, 2015

As an alternative, the Court may extend the deadline for Defendants' Response to Lead Plaintiffs' Class Certification Motion proportionately if the class representatives are not available for deposition by September 25, 2015.

2. SETTLEMENT AND ADR

Defendants and Lead Plaintiffs filed certifications pursuant to ADR Local Rule 3-5(b). (ECF Nos. 91, 96, 97.) The parties agree to conduct private mediation by January 31, 2016. The parties further agree to submit to the Court the name of a mutually agreed mediator by July 3, 2015. A compliance hearing regarding the parties' selection of a mediator shall be held on Friday, July 10, 2015 on the Court's 9:01 a.m. calendar, in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, Courtroom 1.

Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file either: (a) statement identifying their selected mediator and the status of their scheduling mediation; or (b) a one-page JOINT STATEMENT setting forth an explanation for their failure to comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off calendar.

Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions.

3. SCHEDULING

The parties' proposed schedule and discovery plan is set forth as follows:

Event Date Initial Disclosures May 21, 2015 Defendants' Answer May 14, 2015 Initial Written Discovery Served June 1, 2015 Lead Plaintiffs Disclose Identities of Confidential Witnesses June 24, 2015 Initial Document Production Substantially Complete October 23, 2015 Follow Up Written Discovery Served November 6, 2015 Follow Up Production Substantially Complete February 5, 2015 Joinder of Other Parties and Pleading Amendments February 19, 2016 Close of Fact Discovery June 15, 2016 Expert Reports on Issues Where Party Has Burden of Proof July 6, 2016 Responsive Expert Reports August 11, 2016 Rebuttal Expert Reports September 15, 2016 Expert Discovery Cut-off October 31, 2016 Summary Judgment and Daubert Motions November 17, 2016 Summary Judgment and Daubert Oppositions January 16, 2017 Summary Judgment and Daubert Replies February 16, 2017

The AMENDED JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT is approved as the Case Management Order for this case and all parties shall comply with its provisions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer