Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

JAWBONE v. SOUNDWORKS, INC., 15-cv-0342. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150415965 Visitors: 11
Filed: Apr. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 13, 2015
Summary: REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER NATHANAEL COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff AliphCom ("Jawbone" or "Plaintiff") submits this request to continue the Case Management Conference. The Initial Case Management Conference in this action is currently scheduled to take place on April 15, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. In light of ongoing settlement discussions, the parties hereby request that the conference be continued for eight weeks, until June 10, 2015, or as soon
More

REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Plaintiff AliphCom ("Jawbone" or "Plaintiff") submits this request to continue the Case Management Conference. The Initial Case Management Conference in this action is currently scheduled to take place on April 15, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. In light of ongoing settlement discussions, the parties hereby request that the conference be continued for eight weeks, until June 10, 2015, or as soon as possible thereafter.

Jawbone filed its First Amended Complaint on February 27, 2015. Counsel for Soundworks, Inc. ("Soundworks") waived service and, accordingly, must file an answer or responsive pleading on or before April 28, 2015. Soundworks has not yet answered the First Amended Complaint or otherwise appeared. In the meantime, the parties have been engaged in settlement discussions. Progress has been made and the parties are optimistic that a settlement can be finalized in the near future. Accordingly, Jawbone believes it would be appropriate to continue the Initial Case Management Conference for a sufficient amount of time to allow settlement discussions to proceed, and therefore respectfully request that the Initial Case Management Conference currently set for April 15, be continued for eight weeks until June 10, 2015. The requested extension will not affect the Court's case management schedule.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer