U.S. v. ANDERSON, 14-cv-01932-JST. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150105397
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2015
Summary: ORDER VACATING HEARING Re: ECF Nos. 62, 64 JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant Sigurd Anderson's motion to stay, scheduled for hearing on January 15, 2015. ECF No. 62. Also before the Court is Defendant Anderson's motion for instructions to comply with the Court's order, scheduled for hearing on January 22, 2015. ECF No. 64. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds these matters suitable for disposition without oral
Summary: ORDER VACATING HEARING Re: ECF Nos. 62, 64 JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant Sigurd Anderson's motion to stay, scheduled for hearing on January 15, 2015. ECF No. 62. Also before the Court is Defendant Anderson's motion for instructions to comply with the Court's order, scheduled for hearing on January 22, 2015. ECF No. 64. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds these matters suitable for disposition without oral ..
More
ORDER VACATING HEARING
Re: ECF Nos. 62, 64
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Sigurd Anderson's motion to stay, scheduled for hearing on January 15, 2015. ECF No. 62. Also before the Court is Defendant Anderson's motion for instructions to comply with the Court's order, scheduled for hearing on January 22, 2015. ECF No. 64. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds these matters suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearings on these matters are hereby VACATED.
If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the Court's calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
