[PROPOSED] ORDER AUTHORIZING FILING UNDER SEAL OF CONFIDENTIAL VALUATION EVIDENCE (DECLARATION OF JIM D. ALLEN AND SEPTEMBER 5, 2013 APPRAISAL OF 505 S. WOODSVIEW CIRCLE) IN SUPPORT OF RECEIVER'S REPLY TO JEREMY JOHNSON'S OPPOSITION (DOC. NO. 1202) TO MOTION FOR ORDER: (1) APPROVING AND CONFIRMING SALES OF THREE WOODSVIEW PROPERTIES AND FOR RELATED RELIEF; AND (2) GRANTING RELIEF FROM LOCAL RULE 66-5 PERTAINING TO NOTICE TO CREDITORS, AND LIMITING SERVICE THEREOF

MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.

The Court having reviewed and considered the Motion for Order to File Under Seal Confidential Valuation Evidence (Declaration of Jim D. Allen and September 5, 2013 Appraisal of 505 S. Woodsview Circle) in Support of Receiver's Reply to Jeremy Johnson's Opposition (Doc. No. 1202) to Motion for Order (1) Approving and Confirming Sales of Three Woodsview Properties and for Related Relief; and (2) Granting Relief from Local Rule 66-5 Pertaining to Notice to Creditors, and Limiting Service Thereof ("Sealing Motion") filed by Robb Evans of Robb Evans & Associates LLC ("Receiver"), and the Declaration of Jim D. Allen and Exhibit 1 thereto, the September 5, 2013 Appraisal of the real property located at 505 S. Woodsview Circle, St. George, Utah ("505 Woodsview") prepared by Jim D. Allen which have been provisionally filed under seal pursuant to Local Rule 10-5, and having reviewed and considered the responses and oppositions, if any, to the Sealing Motion, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court hereby finds that:

A. The Receiver seeks authorization to file under seal the Declaration of Jim D. Allen and Exhibit 1 thereto, the September 5, 2013 Appraisal prepared by Jim D. Allen of 505 Woodsview Circle (collectively the "Confidential 505 Woodsview Valuation Evidence") in support of the Receiver's Reply to Jeremy Johnson's Opposition (Doc. No. 1202) to Motion for Order (1) Approving and Confirming Sales of Three Woodsview Properties and for Related Relief; and (2) Granting Relief from Local Rule 66-5 Pertaining to Notice to Creditors ("Reply");

B. The Receiver has set forth in the Sealing Motion several reasons why the Receiver seeks to file the Confidential 505 Woodsview Valuation Evidence under seal supported by factual representations to justify sealing the Confidential 505 Woodsview Valuation Evidence at a minimum pending the completion of the sale of 505 Woodsview; and

C. Accordingly, the Court finds and holds that the sealing of the Confidential 505 Woodsview Valuation Evidence is appropriate, and now, therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Sealing Motion is granted; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file the Confidential 505 Woodsview Valuation Evidence under seal and public access to such Confidential 505 Woodsview Valuation Evidence shall not be permitted until further order of the Court; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the service of the Confidential 505 Woodsview Valuation Evidence shall be limited to service on plaintiff Federal Trade Commission and defendant Jeremy Johnson.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Federal Trade Commission and defendant Jeremy Johnson shall not provide the Confidential 505 Woodsview Valuation Evidence or its contents to any other persons or entities.