BOVINO v. INCASE DESIGNS, CORP., 3:14-cv-02105 VC. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150224992
Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2015
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. Upon the Administrative Motion of Incase Designs, Corp, by and through its counsel, for entry of an Order authorizing Incase to file under seal an unredacted copy of its Reply in Support of Its Motion to Strike Plaintiff Infringement Contentions, and it appearing that the relief is warranted, it is hereby ORDERED THAT: 1. Incase's Administrative Motion is granted. 2. Incase's Unredacted Reply in Support of Its Motion to Strike Plaintiff Inf
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. Upon the Administrative Motion of Incase Designs, Corp, by and through its counsel, for entry of an Order authorizing Incase to file under seal an unredacted copy of its Reply in Support of Its Motion to Strike Plaintiff Infringement Contentions, and it appearing that the relief is warranted, it is hereby ORDERED THAT: 1. Incase's Administrative Motion is granted. 2. Incase's Unredacted Reply in Support of Its Motion to Strike Plaintiff Infr..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER
VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.
Upon the Administrative Motion of Incase Designs, Corp, by and through its counsel, for entry of an Order authorizing Incase to file under seal an unredacted copy of its Reply in Support of Its Motion to Strike Plaintiff Infringement Contentions, and it appearing that the relief is warranted, it is hereby ORDERED THAT:
1. Incase's Administrative Motion is granted.
2. Incase's Unredacted Reply in Support of Its Motion to Strike Plaintiff Infringement Contentions, filed on February 3, 2015, shall remain under electronic seal until further order of the Court.
3. No individual or entity shall have access to these documents without further order of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
