Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Licea v. BA&SH America Corp., 5:20-cv-00206-DSF-KKx. (2020)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20200205c28 Visitors: 1
Filed: Feb. 04, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 04, 2020
Summary: CONSENT DECREE DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . 1. This Consent Decree is entered into as of the Effective Date, as defined below in Paragraph 12, by and between the following parties: Plaintiff Luis Licea ("Plaintiff") and Defendant BA&SH America Corp. ("Defendant") (Plaintiff and Defendant shall hereinafter be collectively referred to as the "Parties" and individually as a "Party") for the purposes and on the terms specified herein. RECITALS 2. Title III of the Americans with Disabi
More

CONSENT DECREE

1. This Consent Decree is entered into as of the Effective Date, as defined below in Paragraph 12, by and between the following parties: Plaintiff Luis Licea ("Plaintiff") and Defendant BA&SH America Corp. ("Defendant") (Plaintiff and Defendant shall hereinafter be collectively referred to as the "Parties" and individually as a "Party") for the purposes and on the terms specified herein.

RECITALS

2. Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189 ("ADA") and its implementing regulation, 28 C.F.R. pt. 36, prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability in the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation by any private entity that owns, leases (or leases to), or operates any place of public accommodation. 42 U.S.C. § 12182(a); 28 C.F.R. § 36.201(a).

3. Section 51(f) of the California Civil Code provides that a violation of the right of any individual under the ADA shall also constitute a violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act.

4. On or about January 30, 2020, Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Defendant in United States District Court for the Central District of California. Plaintiff alleged that Defendant's website directed at consumers which can be accessed by U.S. based consumers through the use of the domain name http://www.ba-sh.com/us (the "Website" as further defined in Paragraph 15) contains barriers that prevent full and equal use by blind persons, in violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act, California Civil Code § 51 et seq. and Title III of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189.

5. Defendant expressly denies that the Website violates Title III of the ADA, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, or any other applicable federal or state law, rule, regulation or statute. By entry into this Consent Decree, Defendant does not acknowledge or admit any violation of any law or any wrongdoing of any kind in any respect.

6. This Consent Decree resolves, settles, and compromises all issues between the Parties based on the allegations set forth in Plaintiff's Complaint and those claims or issues which arise from such allegations.

JURISDICTION

7. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant is a private entity that owns and/or operates, or contracts to have operated, the Website which is available through the internet to personal computers, laptops, mobile devices, tablets, and other similar technology. Plaintiff contends that Defendant's Website is a sales and service establishment whose operations affect commerce and a public accommodation subject to Title III of the ADA. 42 U.S.C. §12181(7); 12182(a); 28 C.F.R. §§ 36.104, 36.201(a). Defendant denies that its Website is a public accommodation or a place of public accommodation or is otherwise subject to Title III of the ADA.

8. Plaintiff alleges claims against Defendant pursuant to the ADA. Plaintiff also brings claims under the Unruh Civil Rights Act, which act expressly incorporates the ADA. Plaintiff's claims under the Unruh Civil Rights Act arise from the same nucleus of operative facts and transactions that implicate Plaintiff's claims under the ADA.

9. This Court has jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12188. The Parties agree that venue is appropriate.

AGREED RESOLUTION

10. Plaintiff and Defendant agree that it is in the Parties' best interest to resolve this lawsuit on mutually agreeable terms without further litigation. Accordingly, the Parties agree to the entry of this Consent Decree without trial or further adjudication of any issues of fact or law raised in the Complaint.

11. Pursuant to supplemental jurisdiction, an attendant and related cause of action, arising from the same nucleus of operative facts and arising out of the same transactions, is also brought under California's Unruh Civil Rights Act, which act expressly incorporates the Americans with Disabilities Act.

In resolution of this action, the Parties hereby AGREE and the Court expressly APPROVES, ENTERS, AND ORDERS the following:

DEFINITIONS

12. "Effective Date" means the date on which this Consent Decree is entered on the Court's Docket Sheet following approval by the Court.

13. "Person(s) with a visual impairment" means any person who has a visual impairment who meets the legal definition of blindness in that they have a visual acuity with correction of less than or equal to 20 × 200.

14. "Reasonable Efforts" means, with respect to a given goal or obligation, the commercially reasonable efforts that a reasonable person in Defendant's position would use to achieve that goal or obligation and with respect to Defendant's Website (as defined below) shall mean commercially reasonable efforts to improve the existing level of accessibility of the Website to Persons with a visual impairment by using the Worldwide Web Consortium's Web Content Accessibility Guidelines WCAG 2.1 Level AA Success Criteria (as defined therein) ("WCAG 2.1 AA") as a guideline to make such improvements. Any disagreement by the Parties as to whether Defendant has used Reasonable Efforts as provided for under this Consent Decree shall be subject to the dispute resolution procedures set forth in paragraphs 19 and 21 through 32 of this Consent Decree. Reasonable Efforts shall be interpreted so as not to require Defendant to undertake efforts whose cost, difficulty or impact on Defendant or its affiliates' Website-related operations would constitute an undue burden, as defined in Title III of the ADA but as applied to Defendant's consumer focused merchandise-selling Website-related operations, or would otherwise require efforts that are not commercially reasonable, technically feasible or constitute a fundamental alteration of the Website's features or primary use.

15. The Website, as initially defined in Paragraph 4 above, means the U.S. portion of the eCommerce webpages owned and operated by or on behalf of Defendant that allow consumers to obtain information about Defendant's products and purchase products on-line for delivery to their homes or places of business in some geographic areas. "Website" does not include any mobile applications or Third-Party Content (as defined below), nor does it apply to any portions of the Website directed at business users or Defendant's business partners, or those designated for internal use by Defendant or its affiliates or to websites not owned, operated or controlled by Defendant but that are linked from or to Website or its mobile applications.

16. Third-Party Content means web content that is generated by a third party and not owned, coded, managed, operated by or on behalf of Defendant, or hosted on the Website.

TERM

17. The term of this Consent Decree shall commence as of the Effective Date and remain in effect for fifty-seven (57) months from the Effective Date.

COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE III OF THE ADA AND THE UNRUH CIVIL RIGHTS ACT

18. Web Accessibility Conformance Timeline: Defendant shall use Reasonable Efforts to improve the existing level of accessibility of the Website to Persons with a visual impairment as set forth in paragraph 15 hereof by no later than fifty-seven months from the Effective Date (the "Compliance Date"; the period from the Effective Date to the Compliance Date shall be the "Modification Period").

19. Plaintiff's Right to Conduct Compliance Audit: Plaintiff (through Plaintiff's counsel) shall have the right to perform, at his own cost, his own accessibility testing of the Website. Plaintiff (through Plaintiff's counsel) shall have thirty (30) days from the end of the Modification Period to identify to Defendant in writing any ways in which he reasonably believes and contends that Defendant has not substantially complied with its obligations under paragraphs 14 and 18. Such written notice shall specify in detail the alleged breach and the reason why Plaintiff believes that Defendant has not substantially complied with its obligations under paragraphs 14 and 18. If Plaintiff does not raise any issues in writing within the applicable 30-day time frame, Plaintiff will be deemed to have waived any and all remaining rights to challenge the accessibility of the Website. If Plaintiff raises any purported failure(s) of Defendant to substantially comply with its obligations under paragraphs 14 and 18 in writing within the permitted 30-day window provided above, the Parties (through their respective counsel) shall meet and confer within sixty (60) days thereafter in good faith to determine a resolution of the issue(s); provided, however, that Plaintiff acknowledges and waive any and all rights that he may otherwise have to recover from Defendant any damages, attorneys' or experts' fees, costs, expenses, or disbursements of any kind related to any such activity.

SPECIFIC RELIEF TO PLAINTIFF

20. Specific Relief: Plaintiff and Defendant have agreed to settle all matters relating to costs, damages, attorneys' fees, experts' fees, and other financial matters through a separate confidential settlement agreement, the terms of which regarding changes to Defendant's Website are consistent with this Consent Decree (the "Settlement Agreement"). The Settlement Agreement shall be provided to the Court in camera for inspection and review if the Court so requires in order to extend its enforcement jurisdiction over the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

PROCEDURES IN THE EVENT OF DISPUTES

21. The procedures set forth in Paragraphs 19 and 21 through 32 must be exhausted in the event that Plaintiff alleges that Defendant has failed to meet its obligations pursuant to this Consent Decree. There will be no breach of this Consent Decree by Defendant in connection with such allegations until all such procedures have been exhausted.

22. Plaintiff will notify Defendant in writing if he believes that the Website is in any way not compliant with this Consent Decree in accordance with the timeline and procedures set forth in Paragraph 19.

23. If any issue remains unresolved following the Parties' compliance with procedures set forth above, within ninety (90) days thereafter, the Parties will each have an additional sixty (60) days to select an expert and the two selected experts will mutually select an independent expert (the "Accessibility Consultant") with experience in accessible website design who will evaluate the particular item(s) raised based on whether those item(s) of the Website are in substantial conformance with Defendant's obligations under paragraphs 14 and 18.

24. The Parties agree that no breach of this Consent Decree shall be deemed to have occurred unless (a) the Accessibility Consultant determines that the particular item(s) of the Website is not in substantial conformance with Defendant's obligations under paragraphs 14 and 18 and (b) Defendant fails to remedy the issue within a reasonable period of time of not less than ninety (90) days of receiving the Accessibility Consultant's written opinion. If the Accessibility Consultant believes that a reasonable time to remedy the items found to be not usable is longer than 60 days, then the Parties may agree on a longer time period without leave of Court so long as the extension is documented in writing and executed by the Parties to this Agreement or their respective counsel.

25. Should the Parties thereafter have a dispute regarding an issue raised in a notice given under Paragraph 19 after the procedures in Paragraphs 23 through 24 have been exhausted, the dispute shall be handled pursuant to the procedures set forth in Paragraphs 26 through 31 below.

26. If a Party believes that any other Party has not complied with any provision of the Consent Decree, that Party shall provide the other Party with Notice of Non-Compliance containing the following information: (i) the alleged act of non-compliance; (ii) a reference to the specific provision(s) of the Consent Decree that are involved; (iii) a statement of the remedial action sought by the initiating party; and (iv) a brief statement of the specific facts, circumstances and legal argument supporting the position of the initiating party.

27. Within forty-five (45) days of receipt of a Notice pursuant to Paragraph 26, the non-initiating Party shall respond to the initiating Party in writing.

28. Within fourteen (14) days after the response described in Paragraph 27, the Parties shall informally meet and confer and attempt to resolve the issues raised in the Notice.

29. If the matters raised in a Notice provided pursuant to the above are not resolved within forty-five (45) days of the initial meet and confer required by Paragraph 28, either Party may submit the unresolved matters to nonbinding mediation before a mediator chosen by the Parties. If the designated mediator is unable to serve as mediator or the Parties cannot agree to a mediator, then a mediator affiliated with Judicial Arbitration & Mediation Services ("JAMS") shall be appointed. All costs of any mediation shall be borne equally by the Parties. Each Party shall bear their own attorney fees and expert fees in connection with any mediation.

30. If the dispute is not resolved in mediation, the Parties then will submit the matter for binding arbitration before a single arbitrator affiliated with JAMS. The arbitration hearing shall be conducted at a mutually convenient location and pursuant to JAMS Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures. Those Rules will be modified as necessary to ensure that the hearing is held as soon as practicable after the submission to arbitration, and that a written decision on the matter is rendered within sixty (60) days of the last hearing date with each Party to bear their own fees and costs. The award of the arbitrator will be enforceable in this Court. All costs of any arbitration shall be borne equally by the Parties. Each Party shall bear their own attorney fees and expert fees in connection with any arbitration.

31. Any of the time periods set forth in Paragraphs 24 through 30 may be extended by mutual agreement of the Parties.

32. Any notice or communication required or permitted to be given to the Parties hereunder shall be given in writing by e-mail and by overnight express mail or United States first class mail, addressed as follows:

To Plaintiff: Scott J. Ferrell, Esq. PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS 4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 800 Newport Beach, CA 92660 E-mail: sferrell@pacifictrialattorneys.com Phone: (949) 706-6464 Fax: (949) 706-6469 To Defendant: BA&SH America Corp. c/o Lena D. Wade, Esq. Slovak Baron Empey Murphy & Pinkney LLP 74785 Highway 111, Suite 105 Indian Wells, California 92210 Email: wade@sbemp.com Phone: 760-322-9240 Fax: 760-565-1189 With a copy to: Morrison Cohen LLP Attn: Fred H. Perkins, Esq. 909 Third Avenue, 27th floor New York, NY 10022 Email: fhperkins@morrisoncohen.com Phone: 212-735-8647 Fax: 917-522-3147

MODIFICATION

33. No modification of this Consent Decree shall be effective unless in writing and signed by authorized representatives of all Parties.

ENFORCEMENT AND OTHER PROVISIONS

34. The interpretation and enforcement of this Consent Decree shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter for purposes of enforcement of this Consent Decree in accordance with its terms.

35. Except for the Settlement Agreement, this Consent Decree contains the entire agreement of Plaintiff and Defendant concerning the subject matter described and addressed herein, and no other statement, promise, or agreement, either written or oral, made by any party or agent of any party, that is not contained in this Consent Decree shall be enforceable.

36. If any provision of this Consent Decree is determined to be invalid, unenforceable, or otherwise contrary to applicable law, such provision shall be deemed restated to reflect as nearly as possible and to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law its original intent and shall not, in any event, affect any other provisions, all of which shall remain valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.

PERSONS BOUND

37. This Consent Decree shall be binding on the Parties and their successors and assigns. In the event that Defendant seeks to transfer or assign all or part of its interest in any service covered by this Consent Decree, and the successor or assign intends on carrying on the same or similar use of the Website or online services, then the successor or assignee shall be solely responsible for the obligations remaining under this Consent Decree for the duration of the remaining term of the Consent Decree.

38. The Parties to this Consent Decree expressly intend and agree that this Consent Decree shall inure to the benefit of any persons with a visual impairment who seek to access the Website, which visually-impaired persons shall constitute third-party beneficiaries to this Consent Decree to the maximum extent provided by law. Such third-party beneficiaries shall be entitled to enforce the provisions of this Consent Decree against Defendant and enforce the dispute resolution provisions herein, regardless of where they reside in the United States.

39. Plaintiff and Defendant agree that, as of the date of entry of this Consent Decree, litigation is not "reasonably foreseeable" concerning the matters described herein and alleged in the Complaint. To the extent that any of the Parties previously implemented a litigation hold to preserve documents, electronically stored information, or things related to the matters described in Paragraph 3, the Party is no longer required to maintain such a litigation hold. Nothing in this paragraph relieves any Party of any other obligations imposed by this Consent Decree.

40. The signatories represent that they have the authority to bind the respective Parties to this Consent Decree.

CONSENT DECREE HAS BEEN READ

41. This Consent Decree has been carefully read by each of the Parties, and its contents are known and understood by each of the Parties. This Consent Decree is signed freely by each Party executing it. The Parties each had an opportunity to consult with their counsel prior to executing the Consent Decree.

Agreed and Consented to:

Dated: 02/03/2020 /s/ Luis Licea Luis Licea, Individually Dated: 02/03/2020 BA&SH AMERICA CORP. By: /s/ Sarah Benady Its: Chief Executive Officer

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer