Olic v. HDSP Warden, SA CV 16-2234-MWF (SP). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180402848
Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondent's
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondent's ..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss (docket no. 25) is granted and Judgment will be entered denying the First Amended Petition and dismissing this action without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
