Gratz v. Markel Service, Inc., 2:19-cv-05307-JAK-JPR. (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190813908
Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 17) JOHN A. KRONSTADT , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice (the "Stipulation") filed by Plaintiff SUSAN GRATZ ("Plaintiff") and Defendants MARKEL SERVICE, INC. ("Markel Service"), MARKEL WEST, INC. ("Markel West") and MARKEL CORPORATION ("Markel Corp.") (collectively, the "Parties"). The Court APPROVES the Joint Stipulation and orders that
Summary: ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 17) JOHN A. KRONSTADT , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice (the "Stipulation") filed by Plaintiff SUSAN GRATZ ("Plaintiff") and Defendants MARKEL SERVICE, INC. ("Markel Service"), MARKEL WEST, INC. ("Markel West") and MARKEL CORPORATION ("Markel Corp.") (collectively, the "Parties"). The Court APPROVES the Joint Stipulation and orders that P..
More
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 17)
JOHN A. KRONSTADT, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice (the "Stipulation") filed by Plaintiff SUSAN GRATZ ("Plaintiff") and Defendants MARKEL SERVICE, INC. ("Markel Service"), MARKEL WEST, INC. ("Markel West") and MARKEL CORPORATION ("Markel Corp.") (collectively, the "Parties"). The Court APPROVES the Joint Stipulation and orders that Plaintiff's Complaint in the above-referenced action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Pursuant to the Parties' Stipulation, each party shall bear their own respective attorneys' fees and costs incurred in this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
