Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HUNTER v. URS CORPORATION, 3:15-cv-2300 (CRB). (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20151026466 Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND BRIEFING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . WHEREAS, during the Case Management Conference held by the Court on September 11, 2015, Defendant URS Corporation ("Defendant") expressed its intent to file a Motion to Transfer this litigation (the "Motion"); WHEREAS, during the September 11, 2015 Case Management Conference, counsel for Plaintiff Michael Hunter ("Plaintiff") stated that Plaintiff will need ce
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND BRIEFING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE

WHEREAS, during the Case Management Conference held by the Court on September 11, 2015, Defendant URS Corporation ("Defendant") expressed its intent to file a Motion to Transfer this litigation (the "Motion");

WHEREAS, during the September 11, 2015 Case Management Conference, counsel for Plaintiff Michael Hunter ("Plaintiff") stated that Plaintiff will need certain discovery in order to meaningfully respond to any motion to transfer;

WHEREAS, the Court's Order following the Case Management conference (Dkt. No. 42) directed Defendant to file the Motion by September 25, 2015, and set a November 20, 2015 hearing date, but did not set further discovery or briefing deadlines;

WHEREAS, on September 25, 2015, Defendant filed a Motion to Transfer (Dkt. No. 43), including declarations by three witnesses;

WHEREAS, on September 29, 2015, Plaintiff served written discovery requests and deposition notices seeking information, documents, and testimony which he contends is necessary to properly respond to the Motion, including deposition of the declarants supporting the Motion;

WHEREAS, the current deadline for Plaintiff to oppose the Motion is set for October 9, 2015 pursuant to L.R. 7-3(a);

WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred and jointly propose that Plaintiff's Opposition to the Motion be due October 30, 2015, with any Reply by Defendant due November 13, 2015;

WHEREAS, the proposed briefing schedule will not affect the hearing on the Motion currently set for November 20, 2015.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Plaintiff's deadline to file an Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Transfer (Dkt. No. 43) is set for October 30, 2015, and Defendant's deadline to file a Reply is set for November 13, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer