Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

REESE v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORP., 2:13-cv-3811-ODW(PLAx) (2014)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20140924d13 Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 23, 2014
Summary: JUDGMENT OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, District Judge. In light of the Court's orders granting the respective defendant's motions for summary judgment in Reese v. Sprint Nextel Corp., Case No. 2:13-cv-3811-ODW(PLAx) (C.D. Cal. May 9, 2014) (ECF No. 76), Reese v. TracFone Wireless, Inc., Case No. 2:13-cv-5196-ODW(PLAx) (C.D. Cal. May 9, 2014) (ECF No. 38), Reese v. Verizon Wireless Servs. LLC, Case No. 2:13-cv-5197-ODW(PLAx) (C.D. Cal. May 9, 2014) (ECF No. 42), Reese v. AT&T Mobility II LLC, Cas
More

JUDGMENT

OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, District Judge.

In light of the Court's orders granting the respective defendant's motions for summary judgment in Reese v. Sprint Nextel Corp., Case No. 2:13-cv-3811-ODW(PLAx) (C.D. Cal. May 9, 2014) (ECF No. 76), Reese v. TracFone Wireless, Inc., Case No. 2:13-cv-5196-ODW(PLAx) (C.D. Cal. May 9, 2014) (ECF No. 38), Reese v. Verizon Wireless Servs. LLC, Case No. 2:13-cv-5197-ODW(PLAx) (C.D. Cal. May 9, 2014) (ECF No. 42), Reese v. AT&T Mobility II LLC, Case No. 2:13-cv-5198-ODW(PLAx) (C.D. Cal. May 9, 2014) (ECF No. 36), and Reese v. T-Mobile USA, Case No. 2:13-cv-5199-ODW(PLAx) (C.D. Cal. May 9, 2014) (ECF No. 40), and considering the Parties' representations in their May 30, 2014 Joint Status Report, Reese v. Sprint Nextel Corp., Case No. 2:13-cv-3811-ODW(PLAx) Case 2:13-cv-05198-ODW-PLA Document 43 Filed 09/23/14 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:785 (C.D. Cal.)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff Morris Reese shall take nothing; 2. Judgment for each of the Defendants in each of the following related cases: a. Sprint Nextel Corp. (2:13-cv-3811-ODW(PLAx)); b. TracFone Wireless, Inc. (2:13-cv-5196-ODW(PLAx)); c. Verizon Wireless Services LLC (2:13-cv-5197-ODW(PLAx)); d. AT&T Mobility II LLC (2:13-cv-5198-ODW(PLAx)); and e. T-Mobile USA (2:13-cv-5199-ODW(PLAx)). 3. Defendants' counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice. 4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer