Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. ROSTON, CR 15-0098 VC. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150325955 Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . The United States hereby requests that the status conference currently scheduled for Monday, March 30, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. before this Court, be continued until April 14, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. The reason for this request is that the Court indicated needing to change the date from March 30, 2015, and the date at which both parties can be present is April 14, 2015. Assistant Federal Public Defender Eliz
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

The United States hereby requests that the status conference currently scheduled for Monday, March 30, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. before this Court, be continued until April 14, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. The reason for this request is that the Court indicated needing to change the date from March 30, 2015, and the date at which both parties can be present is April 14, 2015.

Assistant Federal Public Defender Elizabeth Falk does not oppose this request.

Additionally, the parties concur that granting an exclusion of time would allow the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation of counsel and continuity of counsel. See 18 U.S.C . § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The parties also agree that the ends of justice served by granting such an exclusion of time for the purposes of effective preparation of counsel and continuity of counsel outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Upon the stipulation of the parties, and good cause being found, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the change of status conference presently scheduled for March 30, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. shall be continued to April 14, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. The Court further finds that the exclusion from the time limits of this period applicable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161 is warranted and that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer