Filed: Mar. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 20, 2015
Summary: ORDER DENYING "OBJECTION TO SETTLEMENT" AND ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER CALL TO APPOINT CLASS COUNSEL Re: Dkt. No. 114 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . On March 9, 2015, Reginald Burgess, a third party to this action appearing pro se, filed a document styled as an "Objection to Settlement re: Skelly Association of Counsel Agreement." On March 16, 2015, counsel for Mr. Burgess and other third parties Lacy Reintsma, Caleb Reintsma, Amy Rickel, Fred Rickel, and Colette Tapia (
Summary: ORDER DENYING "OBJECTION TO SETTLEMENT" AND ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER CALL TO APPOINT CLASS COUNSEL Re: Dkt. No. 114 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . On March 9, 2015, Reginald Burgess, a third party to this action appearing pro se, filed a document styled as an "Objection to Settlement re: Skelly Association of Counsel Agreement." On March 16, 2015, counsel for Mr. Burgess and other third parties Lacy Reintsma, Caleb Reintsma, Amy Rickel, Fred Rickel, and Colette Tapia (c..
More
ORDER DENYING "OBJECTION TO SETTLEMENT" AND ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER CALL TO APPOINT CLASS COUNSEL
Re: Dkt. No. 114
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge.
On March 9, 2015, Reginald Burgess, a third party to this action appearing pro se, filed a document styled as an "Objection to Settlement re: Skelly Association of Counsel Agreement." On March 16, 2015, counsel for Mr. Burgess and other third parties Lacy Reintsma, Caleb Reintsma, Amy Rickel, Fred Rickel, and Colette Tapia (collectively, "Third Parties") filed an Administrative Motion to Consider Call to Appoint Class Counsel. Dkt. No. 114. Under the Court's October 24, 2014 Order, these "Third Parties have no basis to appear in this action." Dkt. No. 101 at 6. The Court denies the Motion and "Objection." The Court will consider the adequacy of proposed class counsel at the class certification stage, consistent with the controlling legal standards.
Before filing any future motion or request in this case, the Third Parties, or an attorney acting on their behalf, must first seek leave of Court. Any request for leave must comply with Civil Local Rule 7-11. The Court may disregard and/or strike any motion or request that does not comport with this Order or any applicable Rule. See Fernando v. PayPal, Inc., 2013 WL 2253785, at *5 (N.D. Cal. May 22, 2013).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
