Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lopez v. Bank of America, N.A., 10-cv-01207-JST. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150508a87 Visitors: 20
Filed: May 06, 2015
Latest Update: May 06, 2015
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION; APPROVING PROPOSED ADDITIONAL POSTCARD; AND SETTING FURTHER SCHEDULE Re: ECF Nos. 49, 50, 61 JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . On March 3, 2015, Plaintiffs moved for final approval of their class action settlement with Defendant. ECF No. 49. Plaintiffs also filed a stipulation asking the Court to approve an additional postcard notice to class members who signed severance agreements with Bank of America between September 4, 2014 and the close of the claims period.
More

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION; APPROVING PROPOSED ADDITIONAL POSTCARD; AND SETTING FURTHER SCHEDULE

Re: ECF Nos. 49, 50, 61

On March 3, 2015, Plaintiffs moved for final approval of their class action settlement with Defendant. ECF No. 49. Plaintiffs also filed a stipulation asking the Court to approve an additional postcard notice to class members who signed severance agreements with Bank of America between September 4, 2014 and the close of the claims period. ECF No. 50. The postcard would inform those class members that, despite their severance agreements, they are entitled to participate as class members in the proposed settlement of this case. Id.

As stated at the April 23, 2015 settlement fairness hearing, the Court advised the parties that postcard notices the settlement administrator sent to class members did not include three specific items of information the Court had previously ordered the notices to include in its preliminary approval order, ECF No. 48. The parties agreed to remedy this error by sending an additional postcard notice to class members, containing the Court-ordered revisions, and to extend the claims period by thirty days.

At the fairness hearing, the Court also ordered Plaintiffs' counsel to provide further information in support of Plaintiffs' counsel's request for attorneys' fees. Specifically, the Court requested information regarding the number of hours worked by each attorney on the case, the general categories of work performed by those attorneys, and the specific tasks those attorneys performed within each category. The Court also ordered Plaintiffs' counsel to submit billing records or other similar source documentation supporting the claimed fees. Finally, the Court expressed concern as to the hourly rates Plaintiffs' attorney Hart charged to the class for work performed by contract attorneys, which ranged from $350 to $400 per hour.

On April 30, 2015, the parties filed a status report addressing the Court's concerns. See ECF No. 61. In the report, the parties proposed a revised schedule and new final fairness hearing date premised on the sending of additional postcard notice and the extended claims period. ECF No. 61. The parties also submitted a proposed additional postcard notice containing the revisions discussed at the hearing, and explained that the settlement administrator would bear the full cost of the additional notice. Id. at 2 & Ex. A. Finally, Plaintiffs' counsel asked for clarification regarding the additional information the Court would need to approve Plaintiffs' request for attorneys' fees. Id. at 1.

In light of the foregoing, the Court hereby orders as follows:

1. The stipulation at ECF No. 50, which pertains to additional notice for class members who signed severance agreements between September 4, 2014 and the end of the claims period, is granted;

2. The revised version of the reminder postcard, ECF No. 61, Ex. A, is approved;

3. The updated implementation schedule, with modifications as shown below, is approved;

Activity Timing of Estimated Activity Deadline Parties submit revised Reminder Postcard to Court for approval By Court Order 04/30/15 Court approves revised Reminder Postcard 15 days after 05/15/15 submission Deadline for Claims Administrator to mail Reminder Postcard 15 days after 05/30/15 to class members who did not submit a claim, request for Court approval exclusion, or objection Last date for Plaintiffs to file renewed motion for attorneys' At least 14 days 6/15/15 Activity Timing of Estimated Activity Deadline fees (see Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements, before the available at deadline for http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ClassActionSettlementGuidance) objecting to the settlement Deadline for class members to submit claim, request for Within 30 days 06/29/15 exclusion, or objection after Reminder Postcard mailed Report from Claims Administrator to Counsel for the Parties Within 30 days 07/29/15 indicating proposed benefits to be paid, incomplete claims, and after close of the deadline for submission of correct Claims Forms. Claims Period Defendants' last day to revoke settlement based on number of 10 days after 08/07/15 requests for exclusion (see Settlement Agreement § 3.16) Claims Administrator notifies the Parties as to the total number of requests for exclusion Parties to submit report to Court regarding final results of Within 15 days 08/13/15 claims after receipt of report from Claims Administrator Final fairness hearing 08/27/15 Court enters final order and judgment 08/27/15 Effective Date of Settlement — assuming no appeals (see 31 days after 09/28/15 Settlement Agreement § 1.11) final approval of settlement Defendants wire settlement pay-out funds to Claims 15 court days 10/15/15 Administrator (see Settlement Agreement § 3.25(c)) after Effective Date Claims Administrator issues the following payments: (1) 30 days after 10/28/15 settlement class awards; (2) service payments to the Settlement Effective Date Class Representatives; (3) Settlement Class Counsel's attorneys' fees and costs to Settlement Class Counsel; (4) costs Activity Timing of Estimated Activity Deadline of administration to the Claims Administrator; (5) PAGA penalties to the Labor &Workforce Development Agency (see Settlement Agreement § 3.25(c)) Defendants file Claims Administrator's written certification of Eight months 06/28/16 completion of settlement administration (see Settlement after the first Agreement § 3.25(c)) mailing date of the Settlement Class Awards by the Claims Administrator to qualified participating claimants

4. Plaintiffs' counsel shall submit, in support of the motion for attorneys' fees, "charts that break down, by individual attorney for whom fees are claimed, the attorney's work on this case by general category, and by specific categories of tasks performed within that category, and . . . the total number of hours worked in each category." See Dyer v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 303 F.R.D. 326, 333 (N.D. Cal. 2014). Plaintiffs' counsel shall also lodge with the Clerk of the Court complete hourly billing records or similar source documentation supporting the fee request. See Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 437 (1983) ("[T]he fee applicant [must] document[] the appropriate hours expended and hourly rates.").

5. Plaintiffs' counsel shall submit the same type of documentation in support of the request for reimbursement for work performed by contract attorneys. Plaintiffs' counsel may only request a reasonable hourly rate for the work that contract attorneys performed. See In re Citigroup Inc. Sec. Litig., 965 F.Supp.2d 369, 393-99 (S.D.N.Y. 2013). The requested rate should be tailored to the particular geographic region in which the contract attorneys worked and the tasks that they performed. Id. Plaintiffs' counsel shall also lodge with the Clerk of the Court records showing the actual hourly rate paid to the contract attorneys for whom fees are claimed.

6. The final approval hearing is set for August 27, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer