Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Keslinke, CR 14-00237-JST. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150818700 Visitors: 31
Filed: Aug. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 17, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PAYMENT OF CRIMINAL MONETARY PENALTIES INTO COURT REGISTRY BEFORE SENTENCING JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . The United States and defendant Anthony Keslinke, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. In the Plea Agreement entered on May 22, 2015, defendant Keslinke agreed to pay $1,359,130 in restitution upon entry of his guilty plea. 2. Defendant Keslinke has agreed to deposit the funds with the Clerk of
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PAYMENT OF CRIMINAL MONETARY PENALTIES INTO COURT REGISTRY BEFORE SENTENCING

The United States and defendant Anthony Keslinke, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. In the Plea Agreement entered on May 22, 2015, defendant Keslinke agreed to pay $1,359,130 in restitution upon entry of his guilty plea.

2. Defendant Keslinke has agreed to deposit the funds with the Clerk of the United States District Court in advance of sentencing for payment of restitution.

3. The parties therefore jointly request that the Court issue this Proposed Order authorizing the Clerk to accept defendant's restitution payments.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court, having considered the Stipulation Regarding Payment of Criminal Monetary Penalties, which arises from the plea agreement entered in this case, the Stipulation having been executed by the United States and defendant's counsel, and good cause appearing, hereby ORDERS as follows:

1. The Stipulation is approved; and

2. The Clerk of Court for the Northern District of California shall accept from the defendant checks or money orders made payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to hold such funds in the Clerk's Registry, including interest earned thereon, for crediting towards the defendant's restitution obligation and pending the further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer