Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

IPtronics Inc. v. Avago Technologies U.S. Inc., 5:14-cv-05647-BLF (PSG). (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150723730 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 22, 2015
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE FOR INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER BETH L. FREEMAN , District Judge . Plaintiffs IPtronics Inc. and Mellanox Technologies Denmark APS (collectively, "IPtronics" or "Plaintiffs") and Defendants Avago Technologies U.S., Inc., Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., Avago Technologies Trading Ltd., and Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Ltd. (collectively, "Avago" or "Defendants"), hereby agree and stipulate,
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE FOR INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Plaintiffs IPtronics Inc. and Mellanox Technologies Denmark APS (collectively, "IPtronics" or "Plaintiffs") and Defendants Avago Technologies U.S., Inc., Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., Avago Technologies Trading Ltd., and Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Ltd. (collectively, "Avago" or "Defendants"), hereby agree and stipulate, by and through their attorneys of record, to the following:

1. Plaintiffs filed their Complaint for Antitrust Violations ("Complaint") on December 29, 2014 [Dkt. No. 1];

2. Defendants filed their Corrected Motion to Dismiss Complaint with Prejudice Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(6) ("Motion") on March 23, 2015 [Dkt. No. 43];

3. The Court entered an Order setting an Initial Case Management Conference date of July 30, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. [Dkt. 52];

4. Plaintiffs filed their Substitute Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss on May 14, 2015 [Dkt. No. 55];

5. Defendants filed their reply papers in connection with the Motion to Dismiss on May 21, 2015 [Dkt. No. 56];and

6. The Court heard argument on the Motion and entered a Minute Order on June 11, 2015 taking Defendants' Motion to Dismiss under submission [Dkt. No. 58];

7. As of the filing of this Joint Stipulation the Court has not yet issued an Order on Defendant's Motion, thus leaving the Parties unable to substantively complete their Rule 26 (f) conference and prepare a Joint Case Management Conference Statement;

8. WHEREAS, In light of the foregoing, the Parties jointly propose, subject to the Court's approval, to continue the current hearing date for Initial Case Management Conference from July 30, 2015 to a date to be set by the Court at its convenience for a Conference to occur approximately 21-30 days after the Court issues its Order on the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint.

9. This is the first extension requested by the Parties relating to the July 30, 2015 hearing dates for Initial Case Management Conference.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PROPOSED ORDER

The Stipulation of the parties is GRANTED. The Initial Case Management Conference currently set for July 30, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. is VACATED. CONTINUED to September 17, 2015 at 10:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer