Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

KIESLICH v. CALIFORNIA CINEMA INVESTMENTS, LLC, 2:17-cv-06985-JFW (JPRx). (2017)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20171011a39 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 10, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT TO WITHDRAW PLAINTIFF'S FLSA CLAIM (CLAIM 1) AND REMAND THE ACTION CLASS ACTION Assigned For All Purposes To : Hon. John F. Walter Courtroom 7A, First Street Courthouse [Filed with Joint Stipulation for Order Entry] JOHN F. WALTER , District Judge . ORDER The Court has reviewed the Joint Stipulation and Request for Entry of Order Granting Leave to Amend the Complaint to Withdraw Pla
More

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT TO WITHDRAW PLAINTIFF'S FLSA CLAIM (CLAIM 1) AND REMAND THE ACTION

CLASS ACTION

Assigned For All Purposes To: Hon. John F. Walter Courtroom 7A, First Street Courthouse

[Filed with Joint Stipulation for Order Entry]

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Joint Stipulation and Request for Entry of Order Granting Leave to Amend the Complaint to Withdraw Plaintiff's FLSA Claim and Remand the Action ("Joint Stipulation") submitted by PLAINTIFF RYAN KIESLICH ("Plaintiff"), on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated employees of DEFENDANT CALIFORNIA CINEMA INVESTMENTS, LLC ("Defendant"), and Defendant (collectively, "the parties").

The parties stipulated to the amendment of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 1, Exh. "C", Att. "2") so as to withdraw the sole federal claim (Claim 1) without prejudice and request an Order remanding the case to state court. The Court approves the relief requested. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Claims 2 through 11, which seek recovery predicated on state law Labor Code violations. The Court remands this action to state court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:

1. The Joint Stipulation to Amend Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint so as to withdraw Plaintiff's first claim for relief under the FLSA pursuant to Federal Rule 15(a) is GRANTED;

2. Claim 1 of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint ("FAC") is deemed withdrawn without prejudice to the right of Plaintiff to assert such a claim at a later date;

3. Plaintiff is granted leave to Amend the FAC by filing the [Proposed] Second Amended Complaint, attached at Exhibit A to the parties' Joint Stipulation, pursuant to Local Rule 15-1 et seq.

4. In light of the amendment of the Plaintiff's complaint so as to withdraw Plaintiff's sole federal claim, the Court is divested of federal question subject matter jurisdiction, and the Court exercises its discretion to remand the instant action to the state court where it originated. The Clerk is therefore directed to REMAND this case to the Superior Court for Los Angeles County, Central District, Central Civil West Courthouse, 600 South Commonwealth Avenue, Los Angeles, California, 90005, LASC Case No. BC664439.

5. Each of the Parties shall bear his/her/its own attorneys' fees and costs with respect to the removal and subsequent remand of the instant action; and

6. After the remand has been effected, the Clerk is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer