Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

PLATYPUS WEAR, INC. v. BB BUGGIES, INC., 2:14-CV-93 JCM (GWF). (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20140912b13 Visitors: 15
Filed: Sep. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 11, 2014
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge. Presently before the court is plaintiff Platypus Wear, Inc.'s motion to dismiss. (Doc. # 16). Defendant BB Buggies, Inc. filed a response (doc. # 20) and plaintiff filed a reply (doc. # 21). On July 14, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion seeking to dismiss defendant's counterclaim for intentional interference with contractual relations. (Doc. # 16). On July 29, 2014, defendant filed an amended counterclaim that omitted that cause of action. (Doc. # 17). An a
More

ORDER

JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.

Presently before the court is plaintiff Platypus Wear, Inc.'s motion to dismiss. (Doc. # 16). Defendant BB Buggies, Inc. filed a response (doc. # 20) and plaintiff filed a reply (doc. # 21).

On July 14, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion seeking to dismiss defendant's counterclaim for intentional interference with contractual relations. (Doc. # 16). On July 29, 2014, defendant filed an amended counterclaim that omitted that cause of action. (Doc. # 17).

An amended complaint supersedes the original pleading, making it "non-existent." Valadez-Lopez v. Chertoff, 656 F.3d 851, 857 (9th Cir. 2011). If a litigant files an amended pleading, then motions to dismiss the original complaint are mooted without prejudice. Johnson v. Cheryl, No. 2:11-cv-00291-JCM-CWH, 2013 WL 3943606, at *2 (D. Nev. July 29, 2013). Therefore, plaintiff's motion to dismiss is now moot.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff Platypus Wear, Inc.'s motion to dismiss (doc. #16) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED without prejudice as moot.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer