AEVOE CORP. v. AE TECH CO., LTD., 2:12-cv-00053-GMN-NJK. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20141028j06
Visitors: 31
Filed: Oct. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2014
Summary: ORDER Docket No. 632 NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to seal related to the joint pretrial order. Docket No. 632. The motion to seal is based, in part, on Defendant AE Tech's designation of certain information as confidential pursuant to the protective order. See id. at 2. Although Plaintiff served the joint pretrial order itself on AE Tech, see Docket No. 634, it did not file a proof of service on AE Tech with respect to the motion to seal.
Summary: ORDER Docket No. 632 NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to seal related to the joint pretrial order. Docket No. 632. The motion to seal is based, in part, on Defendant AE Tech's designation of certain information as confidential pursuant to the protective order. See id. at 2. Although Plaintiff served the joint pretrial order itself on AE Tech, see Docket No. 634, it did not file a proof of service on AE Tech with respect to the motion to seal. ..
More
ORDER Docket No. 632
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to seal related to the joint pretrial order. Docket No. 632. The motion to seal is based, in part, on Defendant AE Tech's designation of certain information as confidential pursuant to the protective order. See id. at 2. Although Plaintiff served the joint pretrial order itself on AE Tech, see Docket No. 634, it did not file a proof of service on AE Tech with respect to the motion to seal. As such, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to serve its motion to seal and a copy of this order on AE Tech no later than October 23, 2014. Defendant AE Tech is required to respond to the motion to seal, no later than November 6, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
