Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Roy v. County of Contra Costa, 3:15-cv-02672-TEH. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150929863 Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 28, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR EXCHANGE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES, FILING OF RULE 26(f) REPORT, AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT AND TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE THELTON E. HENDERSON , Senior District Judge . WHEREAS Plaintiff CHADRICK ROY and Defendants COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA; DAVID O. LIVINGSTON, SHERIFF; CITY OF CONCORD; and CITY OF CONCORD POLICE CHIEF GUY SWANGER ("Defendants") (collectively the "Parties"), by their undersigned counsel, c
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR EXCHANGE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES, FILING OF RULE 26(f) REPORT, AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT AND TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

WHEREAS Plaintiff CHADRICK ROY and Defendants COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA; DAVID O. LIVINGSTON, SHERIFF; CITY OF CONCORD; and CITY OF CONCORD POLICE CHIEF GUY SWANGER ("Defendants") (collectively the "Parties"), by their undersigned counsel, completed their early planning meeting pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 26(f), on August 20, 2015;

WHEREAS, this case was originally assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler and was reassigned to Senior District Judge Thelton Henderson on July 17, 2015;

WHEREAS, upon reassignment to Senior District Judge Henderson, the Initial Case Management Conference was rescheduled from September 10, 2015 to October 5, 2015, and the Case Management Statement due date was continued from September 3, 2015 to September 28, 2015;

WHEREAS, pursuant to the parties' stipulation and this Court's August 26, 2015 order, the parties exchange of initial disclosures and the parties' deadline to file their Rule 26(f) report was moved to September 28, 2015;

WHEREAS, Defendants each filed motions to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and the motions were heard in this Court on September 14, 2015;

WHEREAS, the Court has not issued its orders on defendants' motions to dismiss and consequently the pleadings are not settled;

WHEREAS, counsel for plaintiff is unavailable for a Case Management Conference appearance on October 19, 2015 due to a pre-planned out-of-state trip;

WHEREAS, the parties wish to continue the date for initial disclosures, filing the Rule 26(f) report, and filing the Case Management Conference statement to October 19, 2015, and wish to continue the Case Management Conference to October 26, 2015 to allow for more clarity on the pleadings;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The deadline to exchange initial disclosures is continued to October 19, 2015; 2. The deadline to file the Rule 26(f) report is continued to October 19, 2015; 3. The deadline to file the Case Management Conference statement is continued to October 19, 2015; and 4. The Case Management Conference is continued to October 26, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED THAT the deadlines to exchange initial disclosures, to file the Rule 26(f) report, and to file the Case Management Conference statement are continued to October 19, 2015. The Case Management Conference is continued to October 26, 2015.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer