Fuller v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 2:16-cv-07866-MWF-JEM. (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190628910
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2019
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE ACTION MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , District Judge . Having considered the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice between plaintiffs Ray L. Fuller and Maureen L. Fuller ("Plaintiffs") and defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Defendant," collectively, the "Parties"), and finding good cause therefor, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The entire action and any related counterclaims are dismissed
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE ACTION MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , District Judge . Having considered the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice between plaintiffs Ray L. Fuller and Maureen L. Fuller ("Plaintiffs") and defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Defendant," collectively, the "Parties"), and finding good cause therefor, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The entire action and any related counterclaims are dismissed ..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE ACTION
MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, District Judge.
Having considered the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice between plaintiffs Ray L. Fuller and Maureen L. Fuller ("Plaintiffs") and defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Defendant," collectively, the "Parties"), and finding good cause therefor,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. The entire action and any related counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice.
2. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Parties' settlement agreement.
Source: Leagle
