Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BRINCKO v. RIO PROPERTIES INC., 2:10-cv-00930-PMP-PAL. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20140707c46 Visitors: 27
Filed: Jun. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 09, 2014
Summary: DEFENDANT RIO PROPERTIES, INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING SEALED DOCUMENTS PHILLIP M. PRO, District Judge. Pursuant to LR 6-1 and LR 6-2, Defendant Rio Properties, Inc. (the "Rio") hereby submits this Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Order to Show Cause Regarding Sealed Documents (the "Motion"). The Rio respectfully requests that this Court grant the Rio a ten (10) day extension to file a response t
More

DEFENDANT RIO PROPERTIES, INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING SEALED DOCUMENTS

PHILLIP M. PRO, District Judge.

Pursuant to LR 6-1 and LR 6-2, Defendant Rio Properties, Inc. (the "Rio") hereby submits this Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Order to Show Cause Regarding Sealed Documents (the "Motion"). The Rio respectfully requests that this Court grant the Rio a ten (10) day extension to file a response to the Order to Show Cause entered by the Court on May 8, 2014 (Dkt. No. 390) (the "OSC"). The Rio has received confirmation from counsel for Plaintiff John P. Brincko, as Chapter 11 Trustee of Debtor National Consumer Mortgage, Inc. (the "Trustee"), that the Trustee does not oppose the Rio's Motion.

By its Order, the Court required the Rio and the Trustee to "show cause, in writing no later than June 6, 2014, why each of the sealed filings in this case should not be unsealed", and further required the parties to provide a redacted copy of any document for which the Rio and/or the Trustee sought to seal only a portion of the document. See OSC, at 2:6-9.

This case involved the filing of hundreds of pleadings and records, including thousands of pages of exhibits thereto, as well as the presentation of hundreds of multiple-page trial exhibits. Many of these documents and exhibits were initially filed under seal in toto. The Rio is making a diligent review of all documents and exhibits that were filed with this Court, as well as those that were filed originally with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, to ensure that all documents for which the Rio believes a justification for retaining the sealed filing of a document or exhibit — in whole or in part — are properly identified in the Rio's response to the OSC. In particular, the Rio is aware that multiple documents contain information that is subject to this Court's Special Order No. 108. The Rio must prepare a redacted copy of the document that properly protects private individual information pursuant to Special Order No. 108, and present the redacted substitute document in compliance with the OSC. The Rio needs a short additional time period in which to ensure that it has completed its review of all of these documents and exhibits, and has prepared a thorough response to the OSC.

Thus, the Rio respectfully requests that this Court provide a ten (10) day extension — through and including June 16, 2014 — for the Rio to prepare and submit its response to the OSC.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer