EZ SHIPPER RACKS, INC. v. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, 2:16-cv-01150-AB (AJWx). (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20160615a88
Visitors: 1
Filed: Jun. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 14, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ANDRE BIROTTE, Jr. , District Judge . IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for Plaintiffs EZ Shipper Racks, Inc. and Nenad Tomasevic, on the one hand, and counsel for Defendants Arch Insurance Company ("Arch") and Scottsdale Insurance Company ("Scottsdale") on the other hand, as follows: 1. Plaintiffs filed the Complaint in this action on February 18, 2016. 2. Thereafter, Arch and Scottsdale were served and filed Answers to the
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ANDRE BIROTTE, Jr. , District Judge . IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for Plaintiffs EZ Shipper Racks, Inc. and Nenad Tomasevic, on the one hand, and counsel for Defendants Arch Insurance Company ("Arch") and Scottsdale Insurance Company ("Scottsdale") on the other hand, as follows: 1. Plaintiffs filed the Complaint in this action on February 18, 2016. 2. Thereafter, Arch and Scottsdale were served and filed Answers to the ..
More
JOINT STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
ANDRE BIROTTE, Jr., District Judge.
IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for Plaintiffs EZ Shipper Racks, Inc. and Nenad Tomasevic, on the one hand, and counsel for Defendants Arch Insurance Company ("Arch") and Scottsdale Insurance Company ("Scottsdale") on the other hand, as follows:
1. Plaintiffs filed the Complaint in this action on February 18, 2016.
2. Thereafter, Arch and Scottsdale were served and filed Answers to the Complaint. No other party has appeared or been served in this action.
3. This action shall be dismissed with prejudice.
IT SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
