Filed: Jan. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE JANUARY 9, 2015 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge. Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff Michael del Aguila and Defendants Genentech-Roche Pharma Transitional Benefits Plan (erroneously sued as Genentech-Roche Transitional Benefit Plan); Genentech, Inc.; and Plan Administrator of the Genentech-Roche Pharma Transitional Benefits Plan (erroneously sued as Genentech Plan Administrator and Genentech Plan F
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE JANUARY 9, 2015 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge. Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff Michael del Aguila and Defendants Genentech-Roche Pharma Transitional Benefits Plan (erroneously sued as Genentech-Roche Transitional Benefit Plan); Genentech, Inc.; and Plan Administrator of the Genentech-Roche Pharma Transitional Benefits Plan (erroneously sued as Genentech Plan Administrator and Genentech Plan Fi..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE JANUARY 9, 2015 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff Michael del Aguila and Defendants Genentech-Roche Pharma Transitional Benefits Plan (erroneously sued as Genentech-Roche Transitional Benefit Plan); Genentech, Inc.; and Plan Administrator of the Genentech-Roche Pharma Transitional Benefits Plan (erroneously sued as Genentech Plan Administrator and Genentech Plan Fiduciary) (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate to continue the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for January 9, 2015 to January 30, 2015.
WHEREAS, in an Order dated November 13, 2014, the Court set a Case Management Conference for January 9, 2015 (Dkt. No. 15);
WHEREAS, the Court granted Defendants' Motion to Dismiss on December 9, 2014 and ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint no later than January 9, 2015 (Dkt. No. 20);
WHEREAS, Defendants believe that the Case Management Conference will be more productive if it is held after Defendants have an opportunity to review Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and confer with Plaintiff accordingly;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff agrees to continue the Case Management Conference to January 30, 2015;
WHEREAS, no prior continuance has been requested in this case;
WHEREAS, continuing the January 9, 2015 Case Management Conference to January 30, 2015 will not affect the schedule for the remaining case or prejudice the Parties.
THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED by the Parties and respectfully requested that the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for January 9, 2015 be continued to January 30, 2015.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Parties' Stipulation to Continue January 9, 2015 Case Management Conference and for good cause appearing, the Stipulation is approved. The Court hereby orders as follows:
The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for January 9, 2015 at 10:30 a.m. is continued until January 30, 2015 at 10:30 a.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
